You're only two clicks away from your own Twitter dashboard.
Today
Followers
1,216
+107 (+9.65%)
last 14 days
1,216
+107 (+9.65%)
last 14 days
Engagement
3.80
7.09
14 day avg
3.80
7.09
14 day avg
Impressions
3,382
6,415
14 day avg
3,382
6,415
14 day avg
Tweets
5
4
14 day avg
5
4
14 day avg
Engagements per tweet
3.80 EPT today
Highest 14.40 · Average 7.09 ↑14%
Engagements per impression
0.52% EPI today
Highest 1.80% · Average 0.88% ↑100%
Top Tweets
Ranked by impressions
Tweet impressions
3,678 today
Total 89,812 ↑105% · Highest 8,764 · Average 3,057
Tweets
5
today
Total 53 ↑66% · Highest 9 · Average 4
Followers
1,216 followers · +20 today
Growth 107 ↑118% · Best +20 · Average +8
Latest 20 Tweets
| Date | Tweet | Impressions | Engagements | EPI | Likes | Replies | RTs / Quotes | Link clicks | Profile clicks | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
$PBW (Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF)
ETF Ranking:
2020 YTD ---- #2 -------143%
2019 --------- #42 ------ 58%
$PBW (Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF)
ETF Ranking: 2020 YTD ---- #2 -------143% 2019 --------- #42 ------ 58%
$PBW (Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF)
ETF Ranking: 2020 YTD ---- #2 -------143% 2019 --------- #42 ------ 58% |
2,148 | 12 | 0.56% | 0 | 0 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 11 | ||
|
$QQQ Returns over 365 days from purchasing on specific dates pic.twitter.com/DAlbNakbaE
$QQQ Returns over 365 days from purchasing on specific dates pic.twitter.com/DAlbNakbaE
$QQQ Returns over 365 days from purchasing on specific dates pic.twitter.com/DAlbNakbaE
|
468 | 1 | 0.21% | 1 | 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
$NAIL was the 3rd best performing ETF in 2019
From 2017 to today there were 727x 365day periods.
If you bought and held $SPY for any one of those periods, you would have outperformed $NAIL 60% of the time.
$NAIL was the 3rd best performing ETF in 2019
From 2017 to today there were 727x 365day periods. If you bought and held $SPY for any one of those periods, you would have outperformed $NAIL 60% of the time.
$NAIL was the 3rd best performing ETF in 2019
From 2017 to today there were 727x 365day periods. If you bought and held $SPY for any one of those periods, you would have outperformed $NAIL 60% of the time. |
766 | 2 | 0.26% | 0 | 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
|
Since 2017, there have been 10x 30day periods where if you bought and held $ARKK for a year you would have returned:
a gain of 33%
or lost 26%
depending on the day you bought within that same 30day period.
Since 2017, there have been 10x 30day periods where if you bought and held $ARKK for a year you would have returned:
a gain of 33% or lost 26% depending on the day you bought within that same 30day period.
Since 2017, there have been 10x 30day periods where if you bought and held $ARKK for a year you would have returned:
a gain of 33% or lost 26% depending on the day you bought within that same 30day period. |
679 | 12 | 1.77% | 4 | 1 | 0 / 0 | 0 | 7 | ||
|
$TAN (Invesco Solar ETF)
ETF Ranking:
#1 ---------- 2020 YTD -----144%
#31 --------- 2019 YTD ----- 64%
$TAN (Invesco Solar ETF)
ETF Ranking: #1 ---------- 2020 YTD -----144% #31 --------- 2019 YTD ----- 64%
$TAN (Invesco Solar ETF)
ETF Ranking: #1 ---------- 2020 YTD -----144% #31 --------- 2019 YTD ----- 64% |
568 | 7 | 1.23% | 3 | 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 | 4 | ||
|
November Holdings Thoughts:
$WORK +62% Monthly Return
Popped up on potential $CRM acquisition talks. I’m considering trimming by 30%
November Holdings Thoughts:
$WORK +62% Monthly Return Popped up on potential $CRM acquisition talks. I’m considering trimming by 30%
November Holdings Thoughts:
$WORK +62% Monthly Return Popped up on potential $CRM acquisition talks. I’m considering trimming by 30% |
1,465 | 20 | 1.37% | 4 | 1 | 0 / 0 | 0 | 15 | ||
|
Books are the original apps with Stories
Books are the original apps with Stories
Books are the original apps with Stories
|
1,799 | 28 | 1.56% | 12 | 0 | 3 / 0 | 0 | 13 | ||
|
The top 5 ETFs of 2020 were all in the top 10% of ETFs in 2019.
The top 5 ETFs of 2020 were all in the top 10% of ETFs in 2019.
The top 5 ETFs of 2020 were all in the top 10% of ETFs in 2019.
|
1,341 | 19 | 1.42% | 6 | 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 | 13 | ||
|
From 2017 to today there were 727x 365day periods.
There were 1405 ETFs in those periods.
63/1405 underperformed* the $SPY in all 727 periods
*Does not include dividends
From 2017 to today there were 727x 365day periods.
There were 1405 ETFs in those periods. 63/1405 underperformed* the $SPY in all 727 periods *Does not include dividends
From 2017 to today there were 727x 365day periods.
There were 1405 ETFs in those periods. 63/1405 underperformed* the $SPY in all 727 periods *Does not include dividends |
555 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
$ROM (ProShares Ultra Technology)
ETF Ranking:
#9 2019 (101%)
#48 2020 YTD (51%)
$ROM (ProShares Ultra Technology)
ETF Ranking: #9 2019 (101%) #48 2020 YTD (51%)
$ROM (ProShares Ultra Technology)
ETF Ranking: #9 2019 (101%) #48 2020 YTD (51%) |
563 | 2 | 0.36% | 0 | 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
|
Had a great test run of @copy_ai two weeks ago for Finlister.com can't wait to use it more twitter.com/PaulYacoubian/…
Had a great test run of @copy_ai two weeks ago for Finlister.com can't wait to use it more https://twitter.com/PaulYacoubian/status/1321076995904675841
Had a great test run of @copy_ai two weeks ago for Finlister.com can't wait to use it more https://twitter.com/PaulYacoubian/status/1321076995904675841
|
824 | 11 | 1.33% | 3 | 0 | 0 / 0 | 3 | 5 | ||
|
November Returns are looking like 17% with 1 day to go.
vs
$SPY 10%
$QQQ 11%
$ARKW 21%
Top Gains of the month:
$WORK 62%
$TSLA 46%
$LMND 42%
Still fascinated by this market. Still evaluating whether I push harder into ETFs. Monthly comparisons make me think yes, longer = no.
November Returns are looking like 17% with 1 day to go.
vs $SPY 10% $QQQ 11% $ARKW 21% Top Gains of the month: $WORK 62% $TSLA 46% $LMND 42% Still fascinated by this market. Still evaluating whether I push harder into ETFs. Monthly comparisons make me think yes, longer = no.
November Returns are looking like 17% with 1 day to go.
vs $SPY 10% $QQQ 11% $ARKW 21% Top Gains of the month: $WORK 62% $TSLA 46% $LMND 42% Still fascinated by this market. Still evaluating whether I push harder into ETFs. Monthly comparisons make me think yes, longer = no. |
1,550 | 18 | 1.16% | 4 | 2 | 0 / 0 | 0 | 12 | ||
|
$QQQM is a new "Mini" derivative of
$QQQ. The same holdings for 25% less fees but the short term cost is liquidity.
$500m vs $141b under management.
A clever way to buy a small ETF, if $141b AUM screens it out.
$QQQM is a new "Mini" derivative of
$QQQ. The same holdings for 25% less fees but the short term cost is liquidity. $500m vs $141b under management. A clever way to buy a small ETF, if $141b AUM screens it out.
$QQQM is a new "Mini" derivative of
$QQQ. The same holdings for 25% less fees but the short term cost is liquidity. $500m vs $141b under management. A clever way to buy a small ETF, if $141b AUM screens it out. |
770 | 4 | 0.52% | 1 | 1 | 0 / 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
|
When I first read $LMND "will start selling life insurance this quarter but will not underwrite it" I didn't like it that much.
Three weeks later I think of it like $AMZN watching which products are selling well and then launching their own if it is profitable twitter.com/GetBenchmarkCo…
When I first read $LMND "will start selling life insurance this quarter but will not underwrite it" I didn't like it that much.
Three weeks later I think of it like $AMZN watching which products are selling well and then launching their own if it is profitable https://twitter.com/GetBenchmarkCo/status/1332439202395545601
When I first read $LMND "will start selling life insurance this quarter but will not underwrite it" I didn't like it that much.
Three weeks later I think of it like $AMZN watching which products are selling well and then launching their own if it is profitable https://twitter.com/GetBenchmarkCo/status/1332439202395545601 |
1,460 | 10 | 0.68% | 6 | 2 | 0 / 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
|
Looks like market is happy with prioritising profitability rather than growth at all costs. (How I interpreted earnings call) which is refreshing to see.
...but may be the general frothyness of the market of late.
Still very early days. twitter.com/stusim/status/… pic.twitter.com/9FMNEBgD7M
Looks like market is happy with prioritising profitability rather than growth at all costs. (How I interpreted earnings call) which is refreshing to see.
...but may be the general frothyness of the market of late. Still very early days. https://twitter.com/stusim/status/1328418104129404929 pic.twitter.com/9FMNEBgD7M
Looks like market is happy with prioritising profitability rather than growth at all costs. (How I interpreted earnings call) which is refreshing to see.
...but may be the general frothyness of the market of late. Still very early days. https://twitter.com/stusim/status/1328418104129404929 pic.twitter.com/9FMNEBgD7M |
938 | 7 | 0.75% | 2 | 1 | 0 / 0 | 0 | 4 | ||
|
The current price of a stock is never wrong.
That said, I’m glad i have been in the market at least 6 years (not much still) to try and reconcile this. twitter.com/charliebilello…
The current price of a stock is never wrong.
That said, I’m glad i have been in the market at least 6 years (not much still) to try and reconcile this. https://twitter.com/charliebilello/status/1332369964033073155
The current price of a stock is never wrong.
That said, I’m glad i have been in the market at least 6 years (not much still) to try and reconcile this. https://twitter.com/charliebilello/status/1332369964033073155 |
700 | 1 | 0.14% | 1 | 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
$SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares)
ETF Ranking:
#8 2019 (101%)
#1612 2020 YTD (-9%)
$SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares)
ETF Ranking: #8 2019 (101%) #1612 2020 YTD (-9%)
$SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares)
ETF Ranking: #8 2019 (101%) #1612 2020 YTD (-9%) |
523 | 1 | 0.19% | 1 | 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
$SOXL was the best performing ETF in 2019
From 2017 to today there were 727x 365day periods.
If you bought and held $SPY for any one of those periods, you would have outperformed $SOXL 32% of the time.
$SOXL was the best performing ETF in 2019
From 2017 to today there were 727x 365day periods. If you bought and held $SPY for any one of those periods, you would have outperformed $SOXL 32% of the time.
$SOXL was the best performing ETF in 2019
From 2017 to today there were 727x 365day periods. If you bought and held $SPY for any one of those periods, you would have outperformed $SOXL 32% of the time. |
813 | 2 | 0.25% | 2 | 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
The top 9 ETFs from 2017 were all in the bottom 8% in 2018.
Repeating top 1% Year over Year is challenging. pic.twitter.com/fqQpixeoci
The top 9 ETFs from 2017 were all in the bottom 8% in 2018.
Repeating top 1% Year over Year is challenging. pic.twitter.com/fqQpixeoci
The top 9 ETFs from 2017 were all in the bottom 8% in 2018.
Repeating top 1% Year over Year is challenging. pic.twitter.com/fqQpixeoci |
1,151 | 6 | 0.52% | 1 | 1 | 1 / 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
|
This year, Tech ETFs with less holdings are outperforming Tech ETFs with more holdings by nearly 50%.
This year, Tech ETFs with less holdings are outperforming Tech ETFs with more holdings by nearly 50%.
This year, Tech ETFs with less holdings are outperforming Tech ETFs with more holdings by nearly 50%.
|
1,356 | 17 | 1.25% | 7 | 1 | 1 / 0 | 0 | 8 |