Analytics for Twitter
← Back to @StuSim Dashboard

Tweets

Date Tweet Impressions Engagements EPI Likes Replies RTs / Quotes Link clicks Profile clicks
@kurtybot @DruRly
22 0 0.00% 0 0 0 / 0 0 0
@itsKostasWithK @BrianFeroldi Yeah crazy to think
@itsKostasWithK @BrianFeroldi Yeah crazy to think
@itsKostasWithK @BrianFeroldi Yeah crazy to think
18 1 5.56% 1 0 0 / 0 0 0
@DruRly 👋 @niftygateway @Cent
99 2 2.02% 2 0 0 / 0 0 0
@MasaSonCap Haha didn’t know that
@MasaSonCap Haha didn’t know that
@MasaSonCap Haha didn’t know that
117 1 0.85% 0 1 0 / 0 0 0
Despite these two stocks hitting all time highs. The real strength of $ARKK this year has come from the bio/genetics side of things with 7 lifestyle science companies in the ETF returning 25% YTD already.
Despite these two stocks hitting all time highs. The real strength of $ARKK this year has come from the bio/genetics side of things with 7 lifestyle science companies in the ETF returning 25% YTD already.
Despite these two stocks hitting all time highs. The real strength of $ARKK this year has come from the bio/genetics side of things with 7 lifestyle science companies in the ETF returning 25% YTD already.
751 6 0.80% 5 1 0 / 0 0 0
Out of $ARKKs 52 holdings, only 2 stocks are currently sitting at their all time highs: $TWLO: Twilio $TXG: 10x Genetics Which have continued their great runs since this time last year which saw $TWLO return 226%, $TXG 112%, while $ARKK split the difference at 170% pic.twitter.com/LxCyXnYzqn
Out of $ARKKs 52 holdings, only 2 stocks are currently sitting at their all time highs:

$TWLO: Twilio

$TXG: 10x Genetics

Which have continued their great runs since this time last year which saw $TWLO return 226%, $TXG 112%, while $ARKK split the difference at 170% pic.twitter.com/LxCyXnYzqn
Out of $ARKKs 52 holdings, only 2 stocks are currently sitting at their all time highs:

$TWLO: Twilio

$TXG: 10x Genetics

Which have continued their great runs since this time last year which saw $TWLO return 226%, $TXG 112%, while $ARKK split the difference at 170% pic.twitter.com/LxCyXnYzqn
834 5 0.60% 2 1 0 / 0 0 2
Back to back triple digit returns will be very impressive. Being up 14% YTD already has it at a good shot. How much strength is left? pic.twitter.com/EUGmDdsmyw
Back to back triple digit returns will be very impressive. Being up 14% YTD already has it at a good shot.

How much strength is left? pic.twitter.com/EUGmDdsmyw
Back to back triple digit returns will be very impressive. Being up 14% YTD already has it at a good shot.

How much strength is left? pic.twitter.com/EUGmDdsmyw
185 2 1.08% 0 1 0 / 0 0 1
With strength from $ARKK Currently the strongest ETF so far this year is $ARKK, after it and $BLOK remain the only two ETFs to spend both weeks in the top 5. Even more impressive is that in this group of 60 ETFs, $ARKK finished in 2nd place through 2020 with a return of 147%.
With strength from $ARKK

Currently the strongest ETF so far this year is $ARKK, after it and $BLOK remain the only two ETFs to spend both weeks in the top 5.

Even more impressive is that in this group of 60 ETFs, $ARKK finished in 2nd place through 2020 with a return of 147%.
With strength from $ARKK

Currently the strongest ETF so far this year is $ARKK, after it and $BLOK remain the only two ETFs to spend both weeks in the top 5.

Even more impressive is that in this group of 60 ETFs, $ARKK finished in 2nd place through 2020 with a return of 147%.
193 1 0.52% 0 1 0 / 0 0 0
I send a report like this every week for free at finlister.substack.com
I send a report like this every week for free at finlister.substack.com
I send a report like this every week for free at finlister.substack.com
137 9 6.57% 0 1 0 / 0 7 1
After a blockbuster first week to the year, the second week of January saw a week resembling something more normal. The top 5 Tech ETFs (non-levered, non-inverse, >$100 AUM) gained an average of just 2.19% pic.twitter.com/AUsg2tboOv
After a blockbuster first week to the year, the second week of January saw a week resembling something more normal.

The top 5 Tech ETFs (non-levered, non-inverse, >$100 AUM) gained an average of just 2.19% pic.twitter.com/AUsg2tboOv
After a blockbuster first week to the year, the second week of January saw a week resembling something more normal.

The top 5 Tech ETFs (non-levered, non-inverse, >$100 AUM) gained an average of just 2.19% pic.twitter.com/AUsg2tboOv
1,253 9 0.72% 5 1 0 / 0 0 3
@mansa_musa1280 @InvestmentTalkk No sorry
93 4 4.30% 0 0 0 / 0 0 4
@InvestmentTalkk Don’t judge it by those stock rooms. Clubhouse is what you make it
@InvestmentTalkk Don’t judge it by those stock rooms. Clubhouse is what you make it
@InvestmentTalkk Don’t judge it by those stock rooms. Clubhouse is what you make it
1,273 9 0.71% 3 2 0 / 0 0 4
@braddwyer @josephofiowa @SeifelCapital
110 2 1.82% 1 0 0 / 0 0 1
@DNewtheGiant 🙏
12 0 0.00% 0 0 0 / 0 0 0
@DNewtheGiant Could be worth it. On a quick glance there isn’t a huge amount of volume. As someone who doesn’t do a lot of options plays I prefer something with more volume. But yeah, could have been smart especially at the $180 mark the other day
@DNewtheGiant Could be worth it. On a quick glance there isn’t a huge amount of volume. As someone who doesn’t do a lot of options plays I prefer something with more volume. But yeah, could have been smart especially at the $180 mark the other day
@DNewtheGiant Could be worth it. On a quick glance there isn’t a huge amount of volume. As someone who doesn’t do a lot of options plays I prefer something with more volume. But yeah, could have been smart especially at the $180 mark the other day
48 0 0.00% 0 0 0 / 0 0 0
@chanwh6 @CitronResearch Exactly. Not much depth behind this one compared to others. Like I said, I think there could be something to look at regarding what % they actually give. But if you say that and say that they aren’t, you better back it up.
@chanwh6 @CitronResearch Exactly. Not much depth behind this one compared to others.

Like I said, I think there could be something to look at regarding what % they actually give. But if you say that and say that they aren’t, you better back it up.
@chanwh6 @CitronResearch Exactly. Not much depth behind this one compared to others.

Like I said, I think there could be something to look at regarding what % they actually give. But if you say that and say that they aren’t, you better back it up.
60 0 0.00% 0 0 0 / 0 0 0
@itsKostasWithK @CitronResearch Thank you! Hope it helped!
@itsKostasWithK @CitronResearch Thank you! Hope it helped!
@itsKostasWithK @CitronResearch Thank you! Hope it helped!
162 1 0.62% 1 0 0 / 0 0 0
@tmfneuroguy @OphirGottlieb @Benzinga @CitronResearch Yeah can’t even tell if he has actually taken a short position. No disclosures anywhere
@tmfneuroguy @OphirGottlieb @Benzinga @CitronResearch Yeah can’t even tell if he has actually taken a short position. No disclosures anywhere
@tmfneuroguy @OphirGottlieb @Benzinga @CitronResearch Yeah can’t even tell if he has actually taken a short position. No disclosures anywhere
171 0 0.00% 0 0 0 / 0 0 0
@OphirGottlieb @Benzinga Here’s my response twitter.com/stusim/status/…
613 6 0.98% 1 0 0 / 0 0 5
@CarloCignitti It's covid, I don't mind that. Least of my issues with this
@CarloCignitti It's covid, I don't mind that. Least of my issues with this
@CarloCignitti It's covid, I don't mind that. Least of my issues with this
18 0 0.00% 0 0 0 / 0 0 0
@DDALM01 @CitronResearch Yeah. I would have loved them to actually try and break down the % of the donation vs what they claim but no luck.
@DDALM01 @CitronResearch Yeah. I would have loved them to actually try and break down the % of the donation vs what they claim but no luck.
@DDALM01 @CitronResearch Yeah. I would have loved them to actually try and break down the % of the donation vs what they claim but no luck.
365 3 0.82% 0 0 0 / 0 0 3
@AvocadoMatthew Yeah. I honestly can't tell if he is actually short the stock or its just a media play. Little stats or substance to it the video.
@AvocadoMatthew Yeah. I honestly can't tell if he is actually short the stock or its just a media play.

Little stats or substance to it the video.
@AvocadoMatthew Yeah. I honestly can't tell if he is actually short the stock or its just a media play.

Little stats or substance to it the video.
28 1 3.57% 1 0 0 / 0 0 0
@wyzzil @BrianFeroldi Love it! Good luck :)
@wyzzil @BrianFeroldi Love it! Good luck :)
@wyzzil @BrianFeroldi Love it! Good luck :)
128 4 3.12% 0 0 0 / 0 0 4
@TradingMKR @CitronResearch Well said! Congrats!
@TradingMKR @CitronResearch Well said! Congrats!
@TradingMKR @CitronResearch Well said! Congrats!
238 1 0.42% 1 0 0 / 0 0 0
@ProductHunt Very cool. Giving this a try now.
@ProductHunt Very cool. Giving this a try now.
@ProductHunt Very cool. Giving this a try now.
144 1 0.69% 1 0 0 / 0 0 0
@albertobarreto @CitronResearch Wow did he donate the $200k? I’m also not sure if he is actually short these stocks or just making presentations?
@albertobarreto @CitronResearch Wow did he donate the $200k?

I’m also not sure if he is actually short these stocks or just making presentations?
@albertobarreto @CitronResearch Wow did he donate the $200k?

I’m also not sure if he is actually short these stocks or just making presentations?
348 1 0.29% 0 1 0 / 0 0 0
@dbstrauss55 Interesting. I'm at about 17% gearing atm, max gearing of 50%. Plan is to hold around the 20% mark this year and then start reducing but will see how it goes Cash <1%
@dbstrauss55 Interesting. I'm at about 17% gearing atm, max gearing of 50%.

Plan is to hold around the 20% mark this year and then start reducing but will see how it goes

Cash <1%
@dbstrauss55 Interesting. I'm at about 17% gearing atm, max gearing of 50%.

Plan is to hold around the 20% mark this year and then start reducing but will see how it goes

Cash <1%
323 3 0.93% 0 1 0 / 0 0 2
@Tradinghub_CA @cperruna @saxena_puru @OphirGottlieb @chamath Would love this. Few more nibbles down there.
@Tradinghub_CA @cperruna @saxena_puru @OphirGottlieb @chamath Would love this. Few more nibbles down there.
@Tradinghub_CA @cperruna @saxena_puru @OphirGottlieb @chamath Would love this. Few more nibbles down there.
112 3 2.68% 1 1 0 / 0 0 1
@horst_koeppel @CitronResearch I’m assuming that’s why they get reinsurance for 75% of their policies
@horst_koeppel @CitronResearch I’m assuming that’s why they get reinsurance for 75% of their policies
@horst_koeppel @CitronResearch I’m assuming that’s why they get reinsurance for 75% of their policies
387 1 0.26% 0 1 0 / 0 0 0
@matteing Cabin.so has my vote
@matteing Cabin.so has my vote
@matteing Cabin.so has my vote
303 17 5.61% 3 1 0 / 0 10 3
“YouTube Gaming has 40million channels and 80,000 of those have 100,000+ subscribers” Great episode from @Fwiz and @reedjd_ What are you building to support this community? pic.twitter.com/Fk8wSspeMy
“YouTube Gaming has 40million channels and 80,000 of those have 100,000+ subscribers”

Great episode from @Fwiz and @reedjd_

What are you building to support this community? pic.twitter.com/Fk8wSspeMy
“YouTube Gaming has 40million channels and 80,000 of those have 100,000+ subscribers”

Great episode from @Fwiz and @reedjd_

What are you building to support this community? pic.twitter.com/Fk8wSspeMy
1,188 19 1.60% 6 0 0 / 0 0 13
@JonahLupton @gannonbreslin As I'm just getting back into it all. Doing 3x a week, full body olympic lifts. Will change the program after a couple of months when I get closer
@JonahLupton @gannonbreslin As I'm just getting back into it all. Doing 3x a week, full body olympic lifts. Will change the program after a couple of months when I get closer
@JonahLupton @gannonbreslin As I'm just getting back into it all. Doing 3x a week, full body olympic lifts. Will change the program after a couple of months when I get closer
559 3 0.54% 0 1 0 / 0 0 2
@Capecod216 @CitronResearch Thanks Chris. Glad you found it useful
@Capecod216 @CitronResearch Thanks Chris. Glad you found it useful
@Capecod216 @CitronResearch Thanks Chris. Glad you found it useful
415 4 0.96% 1 0 0 / 0 0 3
@JonahLupton @gannonbreslin Impressive! 3x225 is my goal this year at 122lbs. Current max is like 145
@JonahLupton @gannonbreslin Impressive!

3x225 is my goal this year at 122lbs. Current max is like 145
@JonahLupton @gannonbreslin Impressive!

3x225 is my goal this year at 122lbs. Current max is like 145
802 25 3.12% 1 2 0 / 0 0 22
@JonahLupton @gannonbreslin Numbers please
@JonahLupton @gannonbreslin Numbers please
@JonahLupton @gannonbreslin Numbers please
1,233 10 0.81% 2 1 0 / 0 0 7
@SeifelCapital @jablamsky @SahilBloom Recurring tweets can be done through @chirrapp I believe
@SeifelCapital @jablamsky @SahilBloom Recurring tweets can be done through @chirrapp I believe
@SeifelCapital @jablamsky @SahilBloom Recurring tweets can be done through @chirrapp I believe
238 5 2.10% 3 0 0 / 0 0 2
@_tom_leighton_ @CitronResearch A couple of concerns on my end but I'm backing mgmt to overcome them. ESG efforts are not one of my concerns and can't believe its an "actionable" item for the SEC to investigate outside of what I've mentioned in this thread. Q4 will be very interesting from growth perspective.
@_tom_leighton_ @CitronResearch A couple of concerns on my end but I'm backing mgmt to overcome them.

ESG efforts are not one of my concerns and can't believe its an "actionable" item for the SEC to investigate outside of what I've mentioned in this thread.

Q4 will be very interesting from growth perspective.
@_tom_leighton_ @CitronResearch A couple of concerns on my end but I'm backing mgmt to overcome them.

ESG efforts are not one of my concerns and can't believe its an "actionable" item for the SEC to investigate outside of what I've mentioned in this thread.

Q4 will be very interesting from growth perspective.
721 8 1.11% 4 1 0 / 0 0 3
@_tom_leighton_ @lemonade_daily Thanks Tom! Glad you found it useful
@_tom_leighton_ @lemonade_daily Thanks Tom! Glad you found it useful
@_tom_leighton_ @lemonade_daily Thanks Tom! Glad you found it useful
22 1 4.55% 1 0 0 / 0 0 0
@_BETA1019 Thanks :) Great work with $TSLA too!
@_BETA1019 Thanks :)

Great work with $TSLA too!
@_BETA1019 Thanks :)

Great work with $TSLA too!
144 2 1.39% 2 0 0 / 0 0 0
@lemonade_daily Thankyou! Appreciate the share and glad you found it useful. Long $LMND
@lemonade_daily Thankyou! Appreciate the share and glad you found it useful.

Long $LMND
@lemonade_daily Thankyou! Appreciate the share and glad you found it useful.

Long $LMND
218 4 1.83% 1 0 0 / 0 0 3
@AngelaRitter01 @CitronResearch Of $LMND ? A lot of people aren't. If everyone was, it would probably be even more "expensive"
@AngelaRitter01 @CitronResearch Of $LMND ? A lot of people aren't. If everyone was, it would probably be even more "expensive"
@AngelaRitter01 @CitronResearch Of $LMND ? A lot of people aren't. If everyone was, it would probably be even more "expensive"
697 9 1.29% 1 2 0 / 0 0 6
* haha Jan 17 2021
* haha Jan 17 2021
* haha Jan 17 2021
707 5 0.71% 3 0 0 / 0 0 2
Jan 1 2020: $TSLA 3% of portfolio Jan 17 2020: $TSLA 14% of portfolio twitter.com/BrianFeroldi/s…
Jan 1 2020: $TSLA 3% of portfolio
Jan 17 2020: $TSLA 14% of portfolio https://twitter.com/BrianFeroldi/status/1350601730828988416
Jan 1 2020: $TSLA 3% of portfolio
Jan 17 2020: $TSLA 14% of portfolio https://twitter.com/BrianFeroldi/status/1350601730828988416
2,289 13 0.57% 6 1 0 / 0 0 6
@DavidMcDoughnut @mak_FTW @IEX If you guys like Flash Boys, you will LOVE Dark Pools...highly recommend
@DavidMcDoughnut @mak_FTW @IEX If you guys like Flash Boys, you will LOVE Dark Pools...highly recommend
@DavidMcDoughnut @mak_FTW @IEX If you guys like Flash Boys, you will LOVE Dark Pools...highly recommend
118 5 4.24% 3 1 0 / 0 0 1
@BrianFeroldi $LMND just hit 20% of my port the other day, $TSLA at 14%
@BrianFeroldi $LMND just hit 20% of my port the other day, $TSLA at 14%
@BrianFeroldi $LMND just hit 20% of my port the other day, $TSLA at 14%
2,133 15 0.70% 4 2 0 / 0 0 9
@realgamakichi @CitronResearch Appreciate it. Glad you liked it :)
@realgamakichi @CitronResearch Appreciate it. Glad you liked it :)
@realgamakichi @CitronResearch Appreciate it. Glad you liked it :)
468 4 0.85% 1 0 0 / 0 0 3
@SatishGannaman2 @CitronResearch No worries, glad you liked it :)
@SatishGannaman2 @CitronResearch No worries, glad you liked it :)
@SatishGannaman2 @CitronResearch No worries, glad you liked it :)
429 2 0.47% 0 0 0 / 0 0 2
@realdarkromance Yeah, I think it was more of a response to @shai_wininger call out of shorts and negative writers of stocks. Again, I'm happy for someone to comment on how the company is "expensive", but that's very different to crying fraud with no real stats to back it up
@realdarkromance Yeah, I think it was more of a response to @shai_wininger call out of shorts and negative writers of stocks.

Again, I'm happy for someone to comment on how the company is "expensive", but that's very different to crying fraud with no real stats to back it up
@realdarkromance Yeah, I think it was more of a response to @shai_wininger call out of shorts and negative writers of stocks.

Again, I'm happy for someone to comment on how the company is "expensive", but that's very different to crying fraud with no real stats to back it up
52 0 0.00% 0 0 0 / 0 0 0
@realdarkromance Thanks Rajiv, appreciate the share and glad you found it useful.
@realdarkromance Thanks Rajiv, appreciate the share and glad you found it useful.
@realdarkromance Thanks Rajiv, appreciate the share and glad you found it useful.
44 1 2.27% 0 1 0 / 0 0 0
@moreofeverythi1 Seems like an interesting one to day trade for sure
@moreofeverythi1 Seems like an interesting one to day trade for sure
@moreofeverythi1 Seems like an interesting one to day trade for sure
94 4 4.26% 1 0 0 / 0 0 3
$FUBO twitter.com/Benioff/status…
2,209 9 0.41% 2 1 0 / 0 0 6
Considering I haven't really launched finlister.com just yet, this is kind of cool pic.twitter.com/CuiuyLpcpG
Considering I haven't really launched finlister.com just yet, this is kind of cool pic.twitter.com/CuiuyLpcpG
Considering I haven't really launched finlister.com just yet, this is kind of cool pic.twitter.com/CuiuyLpcpG
1,357 18 1.33% 6 0 0 / 0 10 2
@Iamjan99062882 @CitronResearch Thank you Jan, appreciate it and glad you found it useful. Do you own $LMND?
@Iamjan99062882 @CitronResearch Thank you Jan, appreciate it and glad you found it useful. Do you own $LMND?
@Iamjan99062882 @CitronResearch Thank you Jan, appreciate it and glad you found it useful. Do you own $LMND?
714 20 2.80% 0 1 0 / 0 0 19
@mhvestergaard Thanks Mike, appreciate the share!
@mhvestergaard Thanks Mike, appreciate the share!
@mhvestergaard Thanks Mike, appreciate the share!
169 7 4.14% 2 1 0 / 0 0 4
@StockMarketNerd @CitronResearch Thanks Brad
902 17 1.88% 2 0 0 / 0 0 15
@Steffan_HG @CitronResearch Glad you liked it!
@Steffan_HG @CitronResearch Glad you liked it!
@Steffan_HG @CitronResearch Glad you liked it!
503 6 1.19% 0 0 0 / 0 0 6
@MrAngelo234 @CitronResearch Yeah no brainer. I can’t think of obvious competitive advantages that the others have
@MrAngelo234 @CitronResearch Yeah no brainer. I can’t think of obvious competitive advantages that the others have
@MrAngelo234 @CitronResearch Yeah no brainer. I can’t think of obvious competitive advantages that the others have
90 1 1.11% 1 0 0 / 0 0 0
@PaperBagInvest Thanks! Will check it out
@PaperBagInvest Thanks! Will check it out
@PaperBagInvest Thanks! Will check it out
20 0 0.00% 0 0 0 / 0 0 0
That said, I think there are better battles to be fought with companies not engaging in ESG efforts at all. I understand how the ESG movement may be abused by marauding capitalist's, I just don't think $LMND is one of them.
That said, I think there are better battles to be fought with companies not engaging in ESG efforts at all. I understand how the ESG movement may be abused by marauding capitalist's, I just don't think $LMND is one of them.
That said, I think there are better battles to be fought with companies not engaging in ESG efforts at all. I understand how the ESG movement may be abused by marauding capitalist's, I just don't think $LMND is one of them.
2,834 43 1.52% 17 0 0 / 0 0 26
While you may disagree with the valuation, allegations of fraud should not be made lightly. I'm sure $LMND could make it clearer as to what % of unclaimed premiums are actually donated, without revealing claim rates.
While you may disagree with the valuation, allegations of fraud should not be made lightly. I'm sure $LMND could make it clearer as to what % of unclaimed premiums are actually donated, without revealing claim rates.
While you may disagree with the valuation, allegations of fraud should not be made lightly. I'm sure $LMND could make it clearer as to what % of unclaimed premiums are actually donated, without revealing claim rates.
2,845 13 0.46% 7 1 0 / 0 0 5
Additionally, given that $LMND has crossed over the 1m customer mark, "only" 34 nonprofits received a donation. I'm assuming that users have a limited variety of nonprofits they can choose, or that most actually don't choose and $LMND chooses for them.
Additionally, given that $LMND has crossed over the 1m customer mark, "only" 34 nonprofits received a donation. I'm assuming that users have a limited variety of nonprofits they can choose, or that most actually don't choose and $LMND chooses for them.
Additionally, given that $LMND has crossed over the 1m customer mark, "only" 34 nonprofits received a donation. I'm assuming that users have a limited variety of nonprofits they can choose, or that most actually don't choose and $LMND chooses for them.
2,413 10 0.41% 4 1 1 / 0 0 4
Some selected social posts on their site note up to 32% of their unclaimed premiums have been designated to charities. I hope that if audited, $LMND could provide an (but ideally multiple) examples to meet their claim of 40%
Some selected social posts on their site note up to 32% of their unclaimed premiums have been designated to charities.

I hope that if audited, $LMND could provide an (but ideally multiple) examples to meet their claim of 40%
Some selected social posts on their site note up to 32% of their unclaimed premiums have been designated to charities.

I hope that if audited, $LMND could provide an (but ideally multiple) examples to meet their claim of 40%
2,399 9 0.38% 4 1 0 / 0 0 4
Total Revenue does not equal gross written premiums, nor earned premiums so for this exercise, I accept its difficult to calculate. Could it be purposely obfuscated? Yes. Is it? That's a big allegation which Citron is somewhat making. pic.twitter.com/gYp63NaaD5
Total Revenue does not equal gross written premiums, nor earned premiums so for this exercise, I accept its difficult to calculate.

Could it be purposely obfuscated? Yes.

Is it? That's a big allegation which Citron is somewhat making. pic.twitter.com/gYp63NaaD5
Total Revenue does not equal gross written premiums, nor earned premiums so for this exercise, I accept its difficult to calculate.

Could it be purposely obfuscated? Yes.

Is it? That's a big allegation which Citron is somewhat making. pic.twitter.com/gYp63NaaD5
2,487 9 0.36% 3 1 0 / 0 0 5
Is this up to 40% of unclaimed premiums? Hard to tell. Unclaimed premiums or claims are not a seperate line item in their financial reports. But I doubt it considering annualized total revenue stands at $17.8m
Is this up to 40% of unclaimed premiums? Hard to tell. Unclaimed premiums or claims are not a seperate line item in their financial reports.

But I doubt it considering annualized total revenue stands at $17.8m
Is this up to 40% of unclaimed premiums? Hard to tell. Unclaimed premiums or claims are not a seperate line item in their financial reports.

But I doubt it considering annualized total revenue stands at $17.8m
2,378 6 0.25% 2 1 0 / 0 0 3
It's shares not cash, so I'm assuming that the $1.1m was not directly from $LMND rather its foundation, The $1.1m may have come as a cash contribution being classified as "Other insurance expense"
It's shares not cash, so I'm assuming that the $1.1m was not directly from $LMND rather its foundation,

The $1.1m may have come as a cash contribution being classified as "Other insurance expense"
It's shares not cash, so I'm assuming that the $1.1m was not directly from $LMND rather its foundation,

The $1.1m may have come as a cash contribution being classified as "Other insurance expense"
2,471 6 0.24% 2 1 0 / 0 0 3
It's not obvious as to how to calculate this viewing their quarterly filings. Common share contribution to the Lemonade Foundation for 9 months ending Sept 2020 was $12.2m. Well above the $1.1m listed on their site. lemonade.com/giveback-2020
It's not obvious as to how to calculate this viewing their quarterly filings.

Common share contribution to the Lemonade Foundation for 9 months ending Sept 2020 was $12.2m. Well above the $1.1m listed on their site.

lemonade.com/giveback-2020
It's not obvious as to how to calculate this viewing their quarterly filings.

Common share contribution to the Lemonade Foundation for 9 months ending Sept 2020 was $12.2m. Well above the $1.1m listed on their site.

lemonade.com/giveback-2020
2,553 53 2.08% 2 1 0 / 0 43 7
This giveback program has nothing to do with insiders selling shares and everything to do with unclaimed premium. This is where I was hoping Citron would be able to show some facts, if not at the very least, figures...which wasn't really the case.
This giveback program has nothing to do with insiders selling shares and everything to do with unclaimed premium.

This is where I was hoping Citron would be able to show some facts, if not at the very least, figures...which wasn't really the case.
This giveback program has nothing to do with insiders selling shares and everything to do with unclaimed premium.

This is where I was hoping Citron would be able to show some facts, if not at the very least, figures...which wasn't really the case.
2,563 10 0.39% 5 2 0 / 0 0 3
They believe that if some % of unclaimed premiums go to charity, you (as a policy holder) are less likely to make fraudulent claims.
They believe that if some % of unclaimed premiums go to charity, you (as a policy holder) are less likely to make fraudulent claims.
They believe that if some % of unclaimed premiums go to charity, you (as a policy holder) are less likely to make fraudulent claims.
2,564 11 0.43% 6 1 0 / 0 0 4
$LMND's largest claim around their giveback program is that "we give back that unclaimed money (up to 40!) to the nonprofit you chose) Why do this?
$LMND's largest claim around their giveback program is that "we give back that unclaimed money (up to 40!) to the nonprofit you chose)

Why do this?
$LMND's largest claim around their giveback program is that "we give back that unclaimed money (up to 40!) to the nonprofit you chose)

Why do this?
2,680 14 0.52% 4 1 0 / 0 0 9
While in good standing with this certification, I find it hard to imagine how the SEC and FTC could look into $LMND on these allegations pic.twitter.com/SYzwPE6xtc
While in good standing with this certification, I find it hard to imagine how the SEC and FTC could look into $LMND on these allegations pic.twitter.com/SYzwPE6xtc
While in good standing with this certification, I find it hard to imagine how the SEC and FTC could look into $LMND on these allegations pic.twitter.com/SYzwPE6xtc
3,061 13 0.42% 6 1 0 / 0 0 6
While it may not live up to everyones standards, the B-Corp certification is one of, if not one of the leading bodies in this area. If there are more bodies out there measuring ESG, I would love to hear it.
While it may not live up to everyones standards, the B-Corp certification is one of, if not one of the leading bodies in this area.

If there are more bodies out there measuring ESG, I would love to hear it.
While it may not live up to everyones standards, the B-Corp certification is one of, if not one of the leading bodies in this area.

If there are more bodies out there measuring ESG, I would love to hear it.
2,896 13 0.45% 3 1 0 / 0 0 9
Certifications seem to last 3 years before needing to be recertified and $LMND was first certified in 2016, meaning they have most likely been re-certified. And have a score of 83.2 compared to the all B-Corp of 50.9. An objectively strong result, in a cohort of ESG focused co's
Certifications seem to last 3 years before needing to be recertified and $LMND was first certified in 2016, meaning they have most likely been re-certified.

And have a score of 83.2 compared to the all B-Corp of 50.9. An objectively strong result, in a cohort of ESG focused co's
Certifications seem to last 3 years before needing to be recertified and $LMND was first certified in 2016, meaning they have most likely been re-certified.

And have a score of 83.2 compared to the all B-Corp of 50.9. An objectively strong result, in a cohort of ESG focused co's
2,929 16 0.55% 8 1 0 / 0 0 7
B-Corps certifications are "administered by Standards Analysts at the non-profit B Lab. Standards Analysts are located at B Lab's Pennsylvania, New York, and Amsterdam offices. The standards for B Corp Certification are overseen by B Lab's independent Standards Advisory Council" pic.twitter.com/gmhUzZC7YP
B-Corps certifications are "administered by Standards Analysts at the non-profit B Lab. Standards Analysts are located at B Lab's Pennsylvania, New York, and Amsterdam offices. The standards for B Corp Certification are overseen by B Lab's independent Standards Advisory Council" pic.twitter.com/gmhUzZC7YP
B-Corps certifications are "administered by Standards Analysts at the non-profit B Lab. Standards Analysts are located at B Lab's Pennsylvania, New York, and Amsterdam offices. The standards for B Corp Certification are overseen by B Lab's independent Standards Advisory Council" pic.twitter.com/gmhUzZC7YP
3,108 10 0.32% 3 1 0 / 0 0 6
$LMND is a certified b-corporation "Our directors have a fiduciary duty to consider not only our stockholders’ interests, but also our specific public benefit and the interests of other stakeholders affected by our actions."
$LMND is a certified b-corporation

"Our directors have a fiduciary duty to consider not only our stockholders’ interests, but also our specific public benefit and the interests of other stakeholders affected by our actions."
$LMND is a certified b-corporation

"Our directors have a fiduciary duty to consider not only our stockholders’ interests, but also our specific public benefit and the interests of other stakeholders affected by our actions."
3,160 14 0.44% 6 1 0 / 0 0 7
Andrew's main (and really only allegation) comes to not living up to to sufficient social impact standards that the company claims, "This particular company is not doing it at all." and should be investigated as a result. pic.twitter.com/Uz73GsvnMj
Andrew's main (and really only allegation) comes to not living up to to sufficient social impact standards that the company claims, "This particular company is not doing it at all." and should be investigated as a result. pic.twitter.com/Uz73GsvnMj
Andrew's main (and really only allegation) comes to not living up to to sufficient social impact standards that the company claims, "This particular company is not doing it at all." and should be investigated as a result. pic.twitter.com/Uz73GsvnMj
3,631 16 0.44% 9 1 0 / 0 0 6
While I agree with Andrew that the current valuation may cause many to raise an eyebrow. But lofty, hard to make sense of valuations do not automatically mean fraud and "lying" worthy of an investigation from the SEC or FTC is taking place.
While I agree with Andrew that the current valuation may cause many to raise an eyebrow.

But lofty, hard to make sense of valuations do not automatically mean fraud and "lying" worthy of an investigation from the SEC or FTC is taking place.
While I agree with Andrew that the current valuation may cause many to raise an eyebrow.

But lofty, hard to make sense of valuations do not automatically mean fraud and "lying" worthy of an investigation from the SEC or FTC is taking place.
3,390 17 0.50% 8 1 0 / 0 0 8
Additionally, Hindenburg actually disclosed that they had a short position on the stock. It is unclear if Citron is actually short $LMND to start, which would be hilarious if they didn't. There is no indication of a position on their website.
Additionally, Hindenburg actually disclosed that they had a short position on the stock.

It is unclear if Citron is actually short $LMND to start, which would be hilarious if they didn't. There is no indication of a position on their website.
Additionally, Hindenburg actually disclosed that they had a short position on the stock.

It is unclear if Citron is actually short $LMND to start, which would be hilarious if they didn't. There is no indication of a position on their website.
3,669 19 0.52% 9 1 0 / 0 0 9
Compare this 7min video to this short report from Hindenburg Research on $NKLA hindenburgresearch.com/nikola/
Compare this 7min video to this short report from Hindenburg Research on $NKLA

hindenburgresearch.com/nikola/
Compare this 7min video to this short report from Hindenburg Research on $NKLA

hindenburgresearch.com/nikola/
3,794 72 1.90% 7 1 0 / 0 58 6
Normally, I don't care about this kind of stuff. But given $LMNDs recent stock run and their earnings coming in February, it was worth me doing some DD on this to brush up on the company.
Normally, I don't care about this kind of stuff. But given $LMNDs recent stock run and their earnings coming in February, it was worth me doing some DD on this to brush up on the company.
Normally, I don't care about this kind of stuff. But given $LMNDs recent stock run and their earnings coming in February, it was worth me doing some DD on this to brush up on the company.
4,372 22 0.50% 8 1 0 / 1 0 12
But it was quite hard to pinpoint the exact actions taken by $LMND which could constitute anything really close to fraud and deceit painted by Citron. Overvalued with a co-founder who complained about negative traders? Yes. Outright fraudulent? Very tough to tell.
But it was quite hard to pinpoint the exact actions taken by $LMND which could constitute anything really close to fraud and deceit painted by Citron.

Overvalued with a co-founder who complained about negative traders? Yes.

Outright fraudulent? Very tough to tell.
But it was quite hard to pinpoint the exact actions taken by $LMND which could constitute anything really close to fraud and deceit painted by Citron.

Overvalued with a co-founder who complained about negative traders? Yes.

Outright fraudulent? Very tough to tell.
3,987 16 0.40% 8 2 0 / 0 0 6
I'm not a professional investor but I found the video interesting. As a shareholder, I'm happy to hear short cases, and review facts that I might have missed. twitter.com/CitronResearch…
I'm not a professional investor but I found the video interesting.

As a shareholder, I'm happy to hear short cases, and review facts that I might have missed.

https://twitter.com/CitronResearch/status/1350118237237776384
I'm not a professional investor but I found the video interesting.

As a shareholder, I'm happy to hear short cases, and review facts that I might have missed.

https://twitter.com/CitronResearch/status/1350118237237776384
6,997 28 0.40% 8 2 0 / 1 0 17
1/n $LMND has recently become one of my largest positions. It comes with a lot of risks as a young company trying to disrupt the insurance industry. Today, short seller @CitronResearch published an interesting 7min "critique" of the company [Below]
1/n $LMND has recently become one of my largest positions.

It comes with a lot of risks as a young company trying to disrupt the insurance industry.

Today, short seller @CitronResearch published an interesting 7min "critique" of the company [Below]
1/n $LMND has recently become one of my largest positions.

It comes with a lot of risks as a young company trying to disrupt the insurance industry.

Today, short seller @CitronResearch published an interesting 7min "critique" of the company [Below]
44,312 629 1.42% 141 20 22 / 5 0 441
@NotoriousGrow @thtshit__Creigh @instagram @tiktok_us Red Bull owns the brand game. Monster isn’t bad too. Honestly can’t imagine anyone outside of certain parts of America have heard of CELH. Sure you could say this the potential upside, but I view it as nothing but a headwind
@NotoriousGrow @thtshit__Creigh @instagram @tiktok_us Red Bull owns the brand game. Monster isn’t bad too. Honestly can’t imagine anyone outside of certain parts of America have heard of CELH. Sure you could say this the potential upside, but I view it as nothing but a headwind
@NotoriousGrow @thtshit__Creigh @instagram @tiktok_us Red Bull owns the brand game. Monster isn’t bad too. Honestly can’t imagine anyone outside of certain parts of America have heard of CELH. Sure you could say this the potential upside, but I view it as nothing but a headwind
47 2 4.26% 0 0 0 / 0 0 2
@NotoriousGrow @thtshit__Creigh Yeah look I think Monster is crap and Red Bull isn’t great either. Not complaining on taste. But this isn’t Peleton going d2c. It’s a different tasting product, trying to sell into extremely difficult distribution channel. Possible to get a return but capped at 10x.
@NotoriousGrow @thtshit__Creigh Yeah look I think Monster is crap and Red Bull isn’t great either. Not complaining on taste. But this isn’t Peleton going d2c. It’s a different tasting product, trying to sell into extremely difficult distribution channel. Possible to get a return but capped at 10x.
@NotoriousGrow @thtshit__Creigh Yeah look I think Monster is crap and Red Bull isn’t great either. Not complaining on taste. But this isn’t Peleton going d2c. It’s a different tasting product, trying to sell into extremely difficult distribution channel. Possible to get a return but capped at 10x.
39 0 0.00% 0 0 0 / 0 0 0
@NotoriousGrow @thtshit__Creigh Haven’t tried. I just think it’s extremely challenging to drive into Pepsi/coke distribution. They are ruthless in protecting their shelf space
@NotoriousGrow @thtshit__Creigh Haven’t tried. I just think it’s extremely challenging to drive into Pepsi/coke distribution. They are ruthless in protecting their shelf space
@NotoriousGrow @thtshit__Creigh Haven’t tried. I just think it’s extremely challenging to drive into Pepsi/coke distribution. They are ruthless in protecting their shelf space
71 2 2.82% 0 2 0 / 0 0 0
@toomaime Crushing it Tobi, come along way over the last few months! Keep it up!
@toomaime Crushing it Tobi, come along way over the last few months! Keep it up!
@toomaime Crushing it Tobi, come along way over the last few months! Keep it up!
22 1 4.55% 0 0 0 / 0 0 1
@StockMarketNerd @CitronResearch @Lemonade_Inc I watched it and did a quick search. Are Citron actually short the stock, he made it sound like they may not be?
@StockMarketNerd @CitronResearch @Lemonade_Inc I watched it and did a quick search. Are Citron actually short the stock, he made it sound like they may not be?
@StockMarketNerd @CitronResearch @Lemonade_Inc I watched it and did a quick search. Are Citron actually short the stock, he made it sound like they may not be?
421 2 0.48% 1 0 0 / 0 0 1
@CitronResearch So is Citron actually short $LMND I couldn’t work it out
@CitronResearch So is Citron actually short $LMND I couldn’t work it out
@CitronResearch So is Citron actually short $LMND I couldn’t work it out
656 7 1.07% 3 0 0 / 0 0 4
@thtshit__Creigh Yeah if I had to pick out of the two I think it would be $GRWG for reasons similar to what you’ve said
@thtshit__Creigh Yeah if I had to pick out of the two I think it would be $GRWG for reasons similar to what you’ve said
@thtshit__Creigh Yeah if I had to pick out of the two I think it would be $GRWG for reasons similar to what you’ve said
438 2 0.46% 0 1 1 / 0 0 0
@TwiggySwift @_joshrg Yeah I agree. Pretty aggressive M&amp;A landscape. Very possible outcome. Will have to happen sooner than later though is my guess
@TwiggySwift @_joshrg Yeah I agree. Pretty aggressive M&A landscape. Very possible outcome. Will have to happen sooner than later though is my guess
@TwiggySwift @_joshrg Yeah I agree. Pretty aggressive M&A landscape. Very possible outcome. Will have to happen sooner than later though is my guess
19 0 0.00% 0 0 0 / 0 0 0
@AlbinoRynoceros I agree while it’s normal, I feel like there is a lot of survivorship bias for companies that can rebound
@AlbinoRynoceros I agree while it’s normal, I feel like there is a lot of survivorship bias for companies that can rebound
@AlbinoRynoceros I agree while it’s normal, I feel like there is a lot of survivorship bias for companies that can rebound
22 0 0.00% 0 0 0 / 0 0 0
@_joshrg Beverage space is extremely competitive, I worked in it for 3 years...not much but enough to see a lot of it. I don’t like the space and $CELH isn’t compellingly different to reshape the industry. Very expensive for the probability of a phenomenal return I.e. 5-10x
@_joshrg Beverage space is extremely competitive, I worked in it for 3 years...not much but enough to see a lot of it. I don’t like the space and $CELH isn’t compellingly different to reshape the industry. Very expensive for the probability of a phenomenal return I.e. 5-10x
@_joshrg Beverage space is extremely competitive, I worked in it for 3 years...not much but enough to see a lot of it. I don’t like the space and $CELH isn’t compellingly different to reshape the industry. Very expensive for the probability of a phenomenal return I.e. 5-10x
144 3 2.08% 1 1 0 / 0 0 1
@investKM Here’s my holdings at the end of December. Small adds to $CRWD since twitter.com/stusim/status/…
@investKM Here’s my holdings at the end of December. Small adds to $CRWD since https://twitter.com/stusim/status/1346440062574206984
@investKM Here’s my holdings at the end of December. Small adds to $CRWD since https://twitter.com/stusim/status/1346440062574206984
223 1 0.45% 0 0 0 / 0 0 1
@stockpicks69 I’ve got tickets on multiple rocketships. Don’t need or want this one. Hope to see you on Mars anyway
@stockpicks69 I’ve got tickets on multiple rocketships. Don’t need or want this one. Hope to see you on Mars anyway
@stockpicks69 I’ve got tickets on multiple rocketships. Don’t need or want this one. Hope to see you on Mars anyway
56 2 3.57% 1 0 0 / 0 0 1
@bonbon_blm @itsKostasWithK Genuinely, good luck. I really don’t have any skin in the game on this one. A lot of stocks have huge potential, risk/reward is a thing. I’m not participating because I don’t think it’s worth it in this case, but that doesn’t mean it can’t succeed.
@bonbon_blm @itsKostasWithK Genuinely, good luck. I really don’t have any skin in the game on this one. A lot of stocks have huge potential, risk/reward is a thing. I’m not participating because I don’t think it’s worth it in this case, but that doesn’t mean it can’t succeed.
@bonbon_blm @itsKostasWithK Genuinely, good luck. I really don’t have any skin in the game on this one. A lot of stocks have huge potential, risk/reward is a thing. I’m not participating because I don’t think it’s worth it in this case, but that doesn’t mean it can’t succeed.
61 1 1.64% 1 0 0 / 0 0 0
@MaxCagr This thread addresses a couple of my concerns Ultimately, if you are bullish streaming I think there are better plays out there twitter.com/hedgeyecomm/st…
@MaxCagr This thread addresses a couple of my concerns

Ultimately, if you are bullish streaming I think there are better plays out there https://twitter.com/hedgeyecomm/status/1345079130971373568
@MaxCagr This thread addresses a couple of my concerns

Ultimately, if you are bullish streaming I think there are better plays out there https://twitter.com/hedgeyecomm/status/1345079130971373568
34 1 2.94% 0 0 0 / 0 0 1
@thtshit__Creigh I worked inside the cannabis beverage space for 3 years. Both businesses are incredibly hard to compete in for multiple reasons. While their could be solid expansions when regulatory opens up, the risk/reward for me is just not worth it at this time.
@thtshit__Creigh I worked inside the cannabis beverage space for 3 years. Both businesses are incredibly hard to compete in for multiple reasons. While their could be solid expansions when regulatory opens up, the risk/reward for me is just not worth it at this time.
@thtshit__Creigh I worked inside the cannabis beverage space for 3 years. Both businesses are incredibly hard to compete in for multiple reasons. While their could be solid expansions when regulatory opens up, the risk/reward for me is just not worth it at this time.
162 2 1.23% 0 1 0 / 0 0 1
@TheModiTimes While I did have $LMND in mind, I would say this applies to any new stock in general. Although these swings are common, for everyone that does climb back higher im sure there are those that don’t
@TheModiTimes While I did have $LMND in mind, I would say this applies to any new stock in general. Although these swings are common, for everyone that does climb back higher im sure there are those that don’t
@TheModiTimes While I did have $LMND in mind, I would say this applies to any new stock in general. Although these swings are common, for everyone that does climb back higher im sure there are those that don’t
289 1 0.35% 1 0 0 / 0 0 0
@itsKostasWithK *seeing it and not being able to do anything about it
@itsKostasWithK *seeing it and not being able to do anything about it
@itsKostasWithK *seeing it and not being able to do anything about it
88 0 0.00% 0 0 0 / 0 0 0
@itsKostasWithK I’m not sure what’s worse. Not seeing it. Or, not seeing it and not being able to do anything about it.
@itsKostasWithK I’m not sure what’s worse.

Not seeing it.

Or, not seeing it and not being able to do anything about it.
@itsKostasWithK I’m not sure what’s worse.

Not seeing it.

Or, not seeing it and not being able to do anything about it.
444 9 2.03% 1 3 0 / 0 0 5
@InvestmentTalkk A great meme which I like but don’t get
@InvestmentTalkk A great meme which I like but don’t get
@InvestmentTalkk A great meme which I like but don’t get
521 7 1.34% 0 1 0 / 0 0 6
@SarkisBuniatyan The call the dev one recently was phenomenal
@SarkisBuniatyan The call the dev one recently was phenomenal
@SarkisBuniatyan The call the dev one recently was phenomenal
54 1 1.85% 1 0 0 / 0 0 0
The biggest issue I see with stock drops greater than 30% for such a new company is market sentiment and reputation as a serious long term investment. In reality, traders and investors run up stocks...not the management, but management can suffer from volatile investors.
The biggest issue I see with stock drops greater than 30% for such a new company is market sentiment and reputation as a serious long term investment.

In reality, traders and investors run up stocks...not the management, but management can suffer from volatile investors.
The biggest issue I see with stock drops greater than 30% for such a new company is market sentiment and reputation as a serious long term investment.

In reality, traders and investors run up stocks...not the management, but management can suffer from volatile investors.
1,270 15 1.18% 3 2 0 / 0 0 10
If I had to guess some issues $LMND - Not mega growth - Profitability and margin compression - AI sophistication I won’t be catching this live but always happy to hear the bear case. $100 is still much ahead of where I thought this stock would have been when I started buying twitter.com/citronresearch…
If I had to guess some issues $LMND
- Not mega growth
- Profitability and margin compression
- AI sophistication

I won’t be catching this live but always happy to hear the bear case.

$100 is still much ahead of where I thought this stock would have been when I started buying https://twitter.com/citronresearch/status/1349768295856050177
If I had to guess some issues $LMND
- Not mega growth
- Profitability and margin compression
- AI sophistication

I won’t be catching this live but always happy to hear the bear case.

$100 is still much ahead of where I thought this stock would have been when I started buying https://twitter.com/citronresearch/status/1349768295856050177
1,437 8 0.56% 0 0 0 / 0 0 8
$LMND has been and will continue to be a risky stock for me Accounting changes and the long term narrative vs growth and profit expectations of the market are key risks, further stressed by the recent run of the stock. Will be paying very close attention to Q4 earnings. Long. twitter.com/stusim/status/…
$LMND has been and will continue to be a risky stock for me

Accounting changes and the long term narrative vs growth and profit expectations of the market are key risks, further stressed by the recent run of the stock.

Will be paying very close attention to Q4 earnings. Long. https://twitter.com/stusim/status/1326370293900857345
$LMND has been and will continue to be a risky stock for me

Accounting changes and the long term narrative vs growth and profit expectations of the market are key risks, further stressed by the recent run of the stock.

Will be paying very close attention to Q4 earnings. Long. https://twitter.com/stusim/status/1326370293900857345
1,308 2 0.15% 0 0 0 / 0 0 2
@chowzam Congrats! Yeah I think they are great companies to own
@chowzam Congrats! Yeah I think they are great companies to own
@chowzam Congrats! Yeah I think they are great companies to own
379 7 1.85% 1 0 0 / 0 0 6
@DivCultivator Tie it to your favorite stock instead
@DivCultivator Tie it to your favorite stock instead
@DivCultivator Tie it to your favorite stock instead
84 0 0.00% 0 0 0 / 0 0 0
The short sightedness of financial media is just ridiculous. @robinhood has a phenomenal new investor resource collection but it’s algo’s choose to push this crap pic.twitter.com/03jZO41tbj
The short sightedness of financial media is just ridiculous.

@robinhood has a phenomenal new investor resource collection but it’s algo’s choose to push this crap pic.twitter.com/03jZO41tbj
The short sightedness of financial media is just ridiculous.

@robinhood has a phenomenal new investor resource collection but it’s algo’s choose to push this crap pic.twitter.com/03jZO41tbj
1,551 8 0.52% 6 1 0 / 0 0 1
@howardlindzon @Nikita_Arora17 Increasing supply probably makes sense. Mega caps and extensions of multiples show demand is far outstripping supply.
@howardlindzon @Nikita_Arora17 Increasing supply probably makes sense. Mega caps and extensions of multiples show demand is far outstripping supply.
@howardlindzon @Nikita_Arora17 Increasing supply probably makes sense. Mega caps and extensions of multiples show demand is far outstripping supply.
506 1 0.20% 1 0 0 / 0 0 0
“The data is on a mainframe which we can’t access” - overheard on CH
“The data is on a mainframe which we can’t access” - overheard on CH
“The data is on a mainframe which we can’t access” - overheard on CH
228 0 0.00% 0 0 0 / 0 0 0
@garrytan Agreed. Can’t answer the question on what he wants to do and how he wants to be judged. “The whole system is screwed. Except my office is doing everything right” essentially
@garrytan Agreed. Can’t answer the question on what he wants to do and how he wants to be judged. “The whole system is screwed. Except my office is doing everything right” essentially
@garrytan Agreed. Can’t answer the question on what he wants to do and how he wants to be judged. “The whole system is screwed. Except my office is doing everything right” essentially
1,596 11 0.69% 6 0 1 / 0 0 4
@defaultalive Yeah very interesting discussion. It’s clear that people aren’t happy. Whether that’s correct or not, Chase seems to be painting that it’s not that bad. Also interesting that he isn’t sure how to judge the success of his time in office.
@defaultalive Yeah very interesting discussion.

It’s clear that people aren’t happy. Whether that’s correct or not, Chase seems to be painting that it’s not that bad.

Also interesting that he isn’t sure how to judge the success of his time in office.
@defaultalive Yeah very interesting discussion.

It’s clear that people aren’t happy. Whether that’s correct or not, Chase seems to be painting that it’s not that bad.

Also interesting that he isn’t sure how to judge the success of his time in office.
2,102 21 1.00% 4 1 0 / 0 0 16
@GucciTraderTalk Portfolio sizing. I’m currently still building into $CRWD with a limited income. If I can’t build a position to 5-6% of my portfolio, then it’s not really worth it for me. I may own 2 of them by this time next year.
@GucciTraderTalk Portfolio sizing. I’m currently still building into $CRWD with a limited income. If I can’t build a position to 5-6% of my portfolio, then it’s not really worth it for me.

I may own 2 of them by this time next year.
@GucciTraderTalk Portfolio sizing. I’m currently still building into $CRWD with a limited income. If I can’t build a position to 5-6% of my portfolio, then it’s not really worth it for me.

I may own 2 of them by this time next year.
691 32 4.63% 1 1 0 / 0 0 30
Stocks I like but don’t own: $SHOP $TDOC $TTD $SQ Stocks I don’t like and don’t own: $TWTR $AYX $FUBO $CELH $GRWG
Stocks I like but don’t own:
$SHOP
$TDOC
$TTD
$SQ

Stocks I don’t like and don’t own:
$TWTR
$AYX
$FUBO
$CELH
$GRWG
Stocks I like but don’t own:
$SHOP
$TDOC
$TTD
$SQ

Stocks I don’t like and don’t own:
$TWTR
$AYX
$FUBO
$CELH
$GRWG
14,561 289 1.98% 40 10 2 / 1 0 236
@hknightsf @GavinNewsom @DoNotPayLaw
48 0 0.00% 0 0 0 / 0 0 0
@cameroniadeluca People are over fitting pattern matching on Monster. $MNST went public in a completely different financial and beverage landscape. 10x max upside on $CELH and personally I think that probability is extremely low.
@cameroniadeluca People are over fitting pattern matching on Monster. $MNST went public in a completely different financial and beverage landscape. 10x max upside on $CELH and personally I think that probability is extremely low.
@cameroniadeluca People are over fitting pattern matching on Monster. $MNST went public in a completely different financial and beverage landscape. 10x max upside on $CELH and personally I think that probability is extremely low.
852 3 0.35% 1 1 0 / 0 0 1
@dougludlow @MainStreet Big fan. Not a customer...yet
@dougludlow @MainStreet Big fan. Not a customer...yet
@dougludlow @MainStreet Big fan. Not a customer...yet
357 9 2.52% 1 0 0 / 0 0 8
@BrianFeroldi $LMND
1,520 14 0.92% 6 0 0 / 0 0 8
@StockMarketNerd Yeah very interesting. If the report is just that it’s overvalued or lack of AI then that’s not really compelling for me. If it’s about something like accounting fraud that would be more damaging and interesting.
@StockMarketNerd Yeah very interesting. If the report is just that it’s overvalued or lack of AI then that’s not really compelling for me. If it’s about something like accounting fraud that would be more damaging and interesting.
@StockMarketNerd Yeah very interesting. If the report is just that it’s overvalued or lack of AI then that’s not really compelling for me. If it’s about something like accounting fraud that would be more damaging and interesting.
313 3 0.96% 2 0 0 / 0 0 1
@thtshit__Creigh Yeah ultimately no need for me to sell here atm
@thtshit__Creigh Yeah ultimately no need for me to sell here atm
@thtshit__Creigh Yeah ultimately no need for me to sell here atm
21 1 4.76% 1 0 0 / 0 0 0
Do I think I can allocate this capital better elsewhere? Yes. Do I really need to do this. No.
Do I think I can allocate this capital better elsewhere? Yes.

Do I really need to do this. No.
Do I think I can allocate this capital better elsewhere? Yes.

Do I really need to do this. No.
712 5 0.70% 0 1 0 / 0 0 4
The biggest benefit to them being in my portfolio is the 70% gearing value that I can contribute to margin...which isn't a great reason but not a bad one.
The biggest benefit to them being in my portfolio is the 70% gearing value that I can contribute to margin...which isn't a great reason but not a bad one.
The biggest benefit to them being in my portfolio is the 70% gearing value that I can contribute to margin...which isn't a great reason but not a bad one.
706 1 0.14% 0 1 0 / 0 0 0
I don't have any issues with the company, other than how they will continue to innovate and compete in an ever increasingly difficult fintech landscape when M&amp;A is going to continue to be difficult.
I don't have any issues with the company, other than how they will continue to innovate and compete in an ever increasingly difficult fintech landscape when M&A is going to continue to be difficult.
I don't have any issues with the company, other than how they will continue to innovate and compete in an ever increasingly difficult fintech landscape when M&A is going to continue to be difficult.
168 2 1.19% 0 1 0 / 0 0 1
Given the size of $V in my port (2%) and their recent anti-trust issues and ultimate termination of the Plaid acquisition, I'm considering trimming or selling this stock.
Given the size of $V in my port (2%) and their recent anti-trust issues and ultimate termination of the Plaid acquisition, I'm considering trimming or selling this stock.
Given the size of $V in my port (2%) and their recent anti-trust issues and ultimate termination of the Plaid acquisition, I'm considering trimming or selling this stock.
1,291 8 0.62% 0 1 0 / 0 0 7
Current Top 3 Holdings by %: $LMND - 20% $AMZN - 17% $TSLA - 14%
Current Top 3 Holdings by %:
$LMND - 20%
$AMZN - 17%
$TSLA - 14%
Current Top 3 Holdings by %:
$LMND - 20%
$AMZN - 17%
$TSLA - 14%
1,811 24 1.33% 12 0 0 / 0 0 12
@JonahLupton Yeah way too big. Considering lack of M&amp;A history I would guess it will be in the sub $1.5b range first up
@JonahLupton Yeah way too big. Considering lack of M&A history I would guess it will be in the sub $1.5b range first up
@JonahLupton Yeah way too big. Considering lack of M&A history I would guess it will be in the sub $1.5b range first up
301 0 0.00% 0 0 0 / 0 0 0
@JonahLupton I was think CRM play too. But feel like that’s an easier addition for an app on their developer platform to tackle
@JonahLupton I was think CRM play too. But feel like that’s an easier addition for an app on their developer platform to tackle
@JonahLupton I was think CRM play too. But feel like that’s an easier addition for an app on their developer platform to tackle
440 2 0.45% 1 1 0 / 0 0 0
@JonahLupton Big enough to be meaningful. Could make a lot of sense.
@JonahLupton Big enough to be meaningful. Could make a lot of sense.
@JonahLupton Big enough to be meaningful. Could make a lot of sense.
481 2 0.42% 1 1 0 / 0 0 0
@chiefgayofficer Currently training for the olympics in rowing and launching a startup. 2x D1 national champion. Would love to chat
@chiefgayofficer Currently training for the olympics in rowing and launching a startup. 2x D1 national champion. Would love to chat
@chiefgayofficer Currently training for the olympics in rowing and launching a startup. 2x D1 national champion. Would love to chat
25 0 0.00% 0 0 0 / 0 0 0
@gannonbreslin It's probably better that I didn't look at $LMND stock till 2022
@gannonbreslin It's probably better that I didn't look at $LMND stock till 2022
@gannonbreslin It's probably better that I didn't look at $LMND stock till 2022
2,163 12 0.55% 6 0 0 / 0 0 6
@happyhr10 Second mention. Will have to look into this
@happyhr10 Second mention. Will have to look into this
@happyhr10 Second mention. Will have to look into this
169 2 1.18% 1 0 0 / 0 0 1
@Kanabelfoodie Very interesting. I must be underutilising zoom
@Kanabelfoodie Very interesting. I must be underutilising zoom
@Kanabelfoodie Very interesting. I must be underutilising zoom
157 2 1.27% 1 0 0 / 0 0 1
@learnvesting So that enterprise accounts get access to storage? Is that the play
@learnvesting So that enterprise accounts get access to storage? Is that the play
@learnvesting So that enterprise accounts get access to storage? Is that the play
250 1 0.40% 0 1 0 / 0 0 0
@mvpasarel Love this!
@mvpasarel Love this!
@mvpasarel Love this!
259 0 0.00% 0 0 0 / 0 0 0
@ProductHunt The gloves by the first rower shows they aren't actually a rower
@ProductHunt The gloves by the first rower shows they aren't actually a rower
@ProductHunt The gloves by the first rower shows they aren't actually a rower
119 1 0.84% 1 0 0 / 0 0 0
@DavidMcDoughnut @Superhuman A great play, but I can't imagine @rahulvohra would ever sell.
@DavidMcDoughnut @Superhuman A great play, but I can't imagine @rahulvohra would ever sell.
@DavidMcDoughnut @Superhuman A great play, but I can't imagine @rahulvohra would ever sell.
80 2 2.50% 2 0 0 / 0 0 0
@DavidMcDoughnut @jonbma I do actually actually like the twitter algo in most cases. Finally someone catching up to TikTok.
@DavidMcDoughnut @jonbma I do actually actually like the twitter algo in most cases. Finally someone catching up to TikTok.
@DavidMcDoughnut @jonbma I do actually actually like the twitter algo in most cases. Finally someone catching up to TikTok.
188 3 1.60% 2 1 0 / 0 0 0
@TheModiTimes Haha probably too large. Given their marketplace I think it makes it a harder question to answer as I don't think you want to compete with app integrations. Guess it would be an infrastructure play but would also love to see something in the creator/distribution space.
@TheModiTimes Haha probably too large.

Given their marketplace I think it makes it a harder question to answer as I don't think you want to compete with app integrations.

Guess it would be an infrastructure play but would also love to see something in the creator/distribution space.
@TheModiTimes Haha probably too large.

Given their marketplace I think it makes it a harder question to answer as I don't think you want to compete with app integrations.

Guess it would be an infrastructure play but would also love to see something in the creator/distribution space.
260 1 0.38% 1 0 0 / 0 0 0
Guesses on $ZM s next acquisition?
Guesses on $ZM s next acquisition?
Guesses on $ZM s next acquisition?
4,672 27 0.58% 6 7 0 / 0 0 14
@FrancisSuarez @theSamParr Guest on the pod
@FrancisSuarez @theSamParr Guest on the pod
@FrancisSuarez @theSamParr Guest on the pod
239 2 0.84% 0 0 0 / 0 0 2
@ajsharp @DavidMcDoughnut Maybe @GetMakerlog is closest
42 3 7.14% 2 0 0 / 0 0 1
@Taylor_Nieman So users are saying whether or not the translation is correct? Or it’s all done automatically as users browse more pages and more text is fed into the machine?
@Taylor_Nieman So users are saying whether or not the translation is correct? Or it’s all done automatically as users browse more pages and more text is fed into the machine?
@Taylor_Nieman So users are saying whether or not the translation is correct? Or it’s all done automatically as users browse more pages and more text is fed into the machine?
71 1 1.41% 1 0 0 / 0 0 0
@marty @SlackHQ @stewart Setting this up on Discord pretty well these days
@marty @SlackHQ @stewart Setting this up on Discord pretty well these days
@marty @SlackHQ @stewart Setting this up on Discord pretty well these days
95 0 0.00% 0 0 0 / 0 0 0
@JoshRozin @DavidMcDoughnut @JoinCommonstock pic.twitter.com/oy5Br1tzqS
80 4 5.00% 2 0 0 / 0 0 2
@JoshRozin You following @DavidMcDoughnut and @JoinCommonstock ?
167 13 7.78% 3 1 0 / 0 0 9
@hundenrufus Huge move! We all miss some
@hundenrufus Huge move! We all miss some
@hundenrufus Huge move! We all miss some
71 1 1.41% 0 1 0 / 0 0 0
1% of those who are able to make $100 online go on to make over $100,000 twitter.com/dr/status/1349…
1% of those who are able to make $100 online go on to make over $100,000 https://twitter.com/dr/status/1349056837119709184
1% of those who are able to make $100 online go on to make over $100,000 https://twitter.com/dr/status/1349056837119709184
1,398 4 0.29% 3 0 0 / 0 0 1
@k17ubha So underrated
@k17ubha So underrated
@k17ubha So underrated
56 2 3.57% 2 0 0 / 0 0 0
People in this thread complaining that “$20 is more than Netflix” have not been a part of an actual community before. twitter.com/tzhongg/status…
People in this thread complaining that “$20 is more than Netflix” have not been a part of an actual community before. https://twitter.com/tzhongg/status/1349166728828252163
People in this thread complaining that “$20 is more than Netflix” have not been a part of an actual community before. https://twitter.com/tzhongg/status/1349166728828252163
1,786 13 0.73% 8 0 0 / 0 0 5
@eltintero @5harath @carrd @ajlkn @shoutoutso_ @1foehn Love the new design
68 3 4.41% 3 0 0 / 0 0 0
Love this! Remote work benefits with Plerk via @ProductHunt producthunt.com/posts/plerk
Love this! Remote work benefits with Plerk via @ProductHunt producthunt.com/posts/plerk
Love this! Remote work benefits with Plerk via @ProductHunt producthunt.com/posts/plerk
674 6 0.89% 1 0 0 / 0 2 3
Damn. This would have been great for $V , looking for them to innovate through M&amp;A in a new way now Hope that $AONE can try to scoop up Plaid before Chamath twitter.com/pitdesi/status…
Damn. This would have been great for $V , looking for them to innovate through M&A in a new way now

Hope that $AONE can try to scoop up Plaid before Chamath https://twitter.com/pitdesi/status/1349102873934663680
Damn. This would have been great for $V , looking for them to innovate through M&A in a new way now

Hope that $AONE can try to scoop up Plaid before Chamath https://twitter.com/pitdesi/status/1349102873934663680
1,832 8 0.44% 3 1 0 / 0 0 4
@Amanimalc @MainStreet Congratulations and great choice! Heard great things
@Amanimalc @MainStreet Congratulations and great choice! Heard great things
@Amanimalc @MainStreet Congratulations and great choice! Heard great things
28 1 3.57% 0 0 0 / 0 0 1
Added automatic role upgrades and downgrades. Users can access certain rooms based on what roles they have been granted. twitter.com/StuSim/status/…
Added automatic role upgrades and downgrades. Users can access certain rooms based on what roles they have been granted. https://twitter.com/StuSim/status/1348573070626152455
Added automatic role upgrades and downgrades. Users can access certain rooms based on what roles they have been granted. https://twitter.com/StuSim/status/1348573070626152455
1,176 4 0.34% 0 0 0 / 0 0 4
@nathanwaters MakerLog from @matteing is probably the closest to this that I’ve seen. Not sure if people upload videos though
@nathanwaters MakerLog from @matteing is probably the closest to this that I’ve seen. Not sure if people upload videos though
@nathanwaters MakerLog from @matteing is probably the closest to this that I’ve seen. Not sure if people upload videos though
107 3 2.80% 2 1 0 / 0 0 0
@nathanwaters Yeah just got a loom from a founder the other day with an update of their product and it was phenomenal to get the video
@nathanwaters Yeah just got a loom from a founder the other day with an update of their product and it was phenomenal to get the video
@nathanwaters Yeah just got a loom from a founder the other day with an update of their product and it was phenomenal to get the video
59 1 1.69% 1 0 0 / 0 0 0
@ishverduzco $SNAP , $PINS , $TWTR in that order.
@ishverduzco $SNAP , $PINS , $TWTR in that order.
@ishverduzco $SNAP , $PINS , $TWTR in that order.
416 3 0.72% 1 0 0 / 0 0 2
Portfolio sizing matters twitter.com/jasondebolt/st…
1,076 5 0.46% 1 0 0 / 0 0 4
@cameroniadeluca I would have said this before this last week, but the stock is a dog. I can’t really see how it innovates out of it enough to warrant my money. Can put $$$ to work in so many better places imo. If this was year 3 of Twitter then maybe, but not year 15
@cameroniadeluca I would have said this before this last week, but the stock is a dog. I can’t really see how it innovates out of it enough to warrant my money. Can put $$$ to work in so many better places imo. If this was year 3 of Twitter then maybe, but not year 15
@cameroniadeluca I would have said this before this last week, but the stock is a dog. I can’t really see how it innovates out of it enough to warrant my money. Can put $$$ to work in so many better places imo. If this was year 3 of Twitter then maybe, but not year 15
277 2 0.72% 2 0 0 / 0 0 0
@davidjaxon Thanks David. Didn’t see this one. I am long $LMND and have been talking about it’s risks,I also don’t necessarily agree with everything Shai said. But, do you have any insight on how contributors publish more or less bearish vs bullish articles?
@davidjaxon Thanks David. Didn’t see this one.

I am long $LMND and have been talking about it’s risks,I also don’t necessarily agree with everything Shai said.

But, do you have any insight on how contributors publish more or less bearish vs bullish articles?
@davidjaxon Thanks David. Didn’t see this one.

I am long $LMND and have been talking about it’s risks,I also don’t necessarily agree with everything Shai said.

But, do you have any insight on how contributors publish more or less bearish vs bullish articles?
205 5 2.44% 0 0 0 / 0 0 5
@GrowthStockInv1 @realgamakichi Yeah hope so! So much noise from short sellers, let alone people not even with money on the line
@GrowthStockInv1 @realgamakichi Yeah hope so! So much noise from short sellers, let alone people not even with money on the line
@GrowthStockInv1 @realgamakichi Yeah hope so! So much noise from short sellers, let alone people not even with money on the line
179 1 0.56% 0 0 0 / 0 0 1
@realgamakichi I hear you, I wouldn’t say it was too much of an attack. More of a frustration which I can totally understand too for multiple reasons. In the case of $LMND and most people and companies, have my trust before you don’t and I’m excited to see how this one plays out.
@realgamakichi I hear you, I wouldn’t say it was too much of an attack. More of a frustration which I can totally understand too for multiple reasons.

In the case of $LMND and most people and companies, have my trust before you don’t and I’m excited to see how this one plays out.
@realgamakichi I hear you, I wouldn’t say it was too much of an attack. More of a frustration which I can totally understand too for multiple reasons.

In the case of $LMND and most people and companies, have my trust before you don’t and I’m excited to see how this one plays out.
326 3 0.92% 2 1 0 / 0 0 0
Portfolio construction matters ALMOST as much as the companies you invest in. Fantastic thread and responses from @SeifelCapital When people ask me about stocks they own, I’ll often ask about what their portfolio looks like. twitter.com/seifelcapital/…
Portfolio construction matters ALMOST as much as the companies you invest in.

Fantastic thread and responses from @SeifelCapital

When people ask me about stocks they own, I’ll often ask about what their portfolio looks like. https://twitter.com/seifelcapital/status/1348673325694857219
Portfolio construction matters ALMOST as much as the companies you invest in.

Fantastic thread and responses from @SeifelCapital

When people ask me about stocks they own, I’ll often ask about what their portfolio looks like. https://twitter.com/seifelcapital/status/1348673325694857219
1,418 3 0.21% 2 0 0 / 0 0 1
Q4 results for $LMND just got more interesting. Accounting changes in Q3 were the first reasons. That said, insiders sell shares for a lot of reasons. If I was a trader maybe I’d try and play this move. But right now, holding $LMND till earnings at least, but hoping for years twitter.com/nongaap/status…
Q4 results for $LMND just got more interesting. Accounting changes in Q3 were the first reasons.

That said, insiders sell shares for a lot of reasons.

If I was a trader maybe I’d try and play this move. But right now, holding $LMND till earnings at least, but hoping for years https://twitter.com/nongaap/status/1348769887175364609
Q4 results for $LMND just got more interesting. Accounting changes in Q3 were the first reasons.

That said, insiders sell shares for a lot of reasons.

If I was a trader maybe I’d try and play this move. But right now, holding $LMND till earnings at least, but hoping for years https://twitter.com/nongaap/status/1348769887175364609
2,144 14 0.65% 2 3 0 / 0 0 9
@rrhoover @gregisenberg @whit4th @csallen @Julian I feel like a VC who just tried to be helpful
@rrhoover @gregisenberg @whit4th @csallen @Julian I feel like a VC who just tried to be helpful
@rrhoover @gregisenberg @whit4th @csallen @Julian I feel like a VC who just tried to be helpful
236 21 8.90% 7 1 0 / 0 0 13
@csallen @gregisenberg
759 19 2.50% 9 1 0 / 0 0 9
Let your winners run, but understand that $LMND is ripping Hard not to want to trim after a huge first 3.5months in the stock. Still bullish on the co.
Let your winners run, but understand that $LMND is ripping

Hard not to want to trim after a huge first 3.5months in the stock. Still bullish on the co.
Let your winners run, but understand that $LMND is ripping

Hard not to want to trim after a huge first 3.5months in the stock. Still bullish on the co.
2,326 27 1.16% 10 1 0 / 0 0 16
@BatemanHoldings Don’t mind if I do. Let me get you a fresh glass too
@BatemanHoldings Don’t mind if I do.

Let me get you a fresh glass too
@BatemanHoldings Don’t mind if I do.

Let me get you a fresh glass too
38 1 2.63% 1 0 0 / 0 0 0
@adventuresinfi 🤯🤯
@adventuresinfi 🤯🤯
@adventuresinfi 🤯🤯
513 4 0.78% 2 0 0 / 0 0 2
@GrowthStockInv1 Interesting. I've started it on repl.it which has been cool to check out. One of the easier ways to onboard/deploy code vs something like a jupyter notebook, but yeah not sure what long term hosting viability is like for now on that
@GrowthStockInv1 Interesting. I've started it on repl.it which has been cool to check out. One of the easier ways to onboard/deploy code vs something like a jupyter notebook, but yeah not sure what long term hosting viability is like for now on that
@GrowthStockInv1 Interesting. I've started it on repl.it which has been cool to check out. One of the easier ways to onboard/deploy code vs something like a jupyter notebook, but yeah not sure what long term hosting viability is like for now on that
193 3 1.55% 0 2 0 / 0 1 0
@GrowthStockInv1 Yeah lot of fun. Thanks I'll look into it
@GrowthStockInv1 Yeah lot of fun. Thanks I'll look into it
@GrowthStockInv1 Yeah lot of fun. Thanks I'll look into it
122 2 1.64% 1 1 0 / 0 0 0
@GrowthStockInv1 Good guess! Yes. Had some experience with Firebase before but wanted to give MDB a go again
@GrowthStockInv1 Good guess! Yes.

Had some experience with Firebase before but wanted to give MDB a go again
@GrowthStockInv1 Good guess! Yes.

Had some experience with Firebase before but wanted to give MDB a go again
139 2 1.44% 1 1 0 / 0 0 0
Added database capabilities, so every time a stock is entered, that stock is saved to a database for future reference. twitter.com/StuSim/status/…
Added database capabilities, so every time a stock is entered, that stock is saved to a database for future reference. https://twitter.com/StuSim/status/1348150209059061762
Added database capabilities, so every time a stock is entered, that stock is saved to a database for future reference. https://twitter.com/StuSim/status/1348150209059061762
4,168 12 0.29% 3 2 1 / 1 0 5
@dhaval_kotecha Very interesting series
@dhaval_kotecha Very interesting series
@dhaval_kotecha Very interesting series
1,949 29 1.49% 3 3 0 / 0 0 23
More at $33,553 now. Probably enough for the night
More at $33,553 now.

Probably enough for the night
More at $33,553 now.

Probably enough for the night
1,081 10 0.93% 1 1 0 / 0 0 8
@rafrasenberg Start now *
@rafrasenberg Start now *
@rafrasenberg Start now *
138 2 1.45% 1 0 0 / 0 0 1
2 ETFs which hold $GBTC that I mentioned in finlister.substack.com this time last week Since then, they both started January strong with $BLOK returning 17% and $ARKW up 9% pic.twitter.com/41zjeTs3cC
2 ETFs which hold $GBTC that I mentioned in finlister.substack.com this time last week

Since then, they both started January strong with $BLOK returning 17% and $ARKW up 9% pic.twitter.com/41zjeTs3cC
2 ETFs which hold $GBTC that I mentioned in finlister.substack.com this time last week

Since then, they both started January strong with $BLOK returning 17% and $ARKW up 9% pic.twitter.com/41zjeTs3cC
2,678 17 0.63% 4 0 0 / 0 4 9
@gannonbreslin pic.twitter.com/d687SYQNvL
279 1 0.36% 1 0 0 / 0 0 0
Yum yum pic.twitter.com/76heb4hcMD
5,873 53 0.90% 9 2 0 / 0 0 42
@WitSuma Year 1. How would you cash flow a $5m semi liquid networth tomorrow?
@WitSuma Year 1. How would you cash flow a $5m semi liquid networth tomorrow?
@WitSuma Year 1. How would you cash flow a $5m semi liquid networth tomorrow?
29 1 3.45% 0 1 0 / 0 0 0
@Mat_Sherman Even if you double check size to $2m, that’s 3,000 new companies which raised money which seems pretty positive
@Mat_Sherman Even if you double check size to $2m, that’s 3,000 new companies which raised money which seems pretty positive
@Mat_Sherman Even if you double check size to $2m, that’s 3,000 new companies which raised money which seems pretty positive
146 5 3.42% 0 1 0 / 0 0 4
@Mat_Sherman So looks like around $6b to US Seed. Say $1m per round = 6,000 companies funded. Are there more than 6,000 good new co’s a year do you think? pic.twitter.com/4XWxHJSoKm
@Mat_Sherman So looks like around $6b to US Seed. Say $1m per round = 6,000 companies funded.

Are there more than 6,000 good new co’s a year do you think? pic.twitter.com/4XWxHJSoKm
@Mat_Sherman So looks like around $6b to US Seed. Say $1m per round = 6,000 companies funded.

Are there more than 6,000 good new co’s a year do you think? pic.twitter.com/4XWxHJSoKm
97 2 2.06% 0 1 0 / 0 0 1
@Mat_Sherman Interesting. I know you don’t want to raise a fund, but that’s only a $5m fund. Would be interesting to do deeper calculations on that phantom portfolio
@Mat_Sherman Interesting. I know you don’t want to raise a fund, but that’s only a $5m fund. Would be interesting to do deeper calculations on that phantom portfolio
@Mat_Sherman Interesting. I know you don’t want to raise a fund, but that’s only a $5m fund. Would be interesting to do deeper calculations on that phantom portfolio
93 4 4.30% 1 1 0 / 0 0 2
@Mat_Sherman Out of the 450, how many do you think would have taken a $20k check from you if you offered?
@Mat_Sherman Out of the 450, how many do you think would have taken a $20k check from you if you offered?
@Mat_Sherman Out of the 450, how many do you think would have taken a $20k check from you if you offered?
275 7 2.55% 1 1 0 / 0 0 5
@MasaSonCap Only up 17% YTD
@MasaSonCap Only up 17% YTD
@MasaSonCap Only up 17% YTD
121 1 0.83% 0 1 0 / 0 0 0
Always do your own research...but here’s a good place to start that process twitter.com/aagha/status/1…
Always do your own research...but here’s a good place to start that process https://twitter.com/aagha/status/1348416459043573761
Always do your own research...but here’s a good place to start that process https://twitter.com/aagha/status/1348416459043573761
1,903 22 1.16% 9 1 1 / 0 0 11
@aagha @paul_essen @PythiaR @RedCoatChicago @richard_chu97 @RroseSelavy2 @saxena_puru @stronghobbit @ztinvesting Would also be interesting to see % weights of positions. But maybe too much work.
@aagha @paul_essen @PythiaR @RedCoatChicago @richard_chu97 @RroseSelavy2 @saxena_puru @stronghobbit @ztinvesting Would also be interesting to see % weights of positions. But maybe too much work.
@aagha @paul_essen @PythiaR @RedCoatChicago @richard_chu97 @RroseSelavy2 @saxena_puru @stronghobbit @ztinvesting Would also be interesting to see % weights of positions. But maybe too much work.
74 1 1.35% 0 1 0 / 0 0 0
@aagha @paul_essen @PythiaR @RedCoatChicago @richard_chu97 @RroseSelavy2 @saxena_puru @stronghobbit @ztinvesting Great thread and thanks for the analysis. One way to explain why FAANG is slightly absent is that investors who are on Twitter, and sharing publicly are probably more inclined to own growth stocks. That’s my guess anyway
@aagha @paul_essen @PythiaR @RedCoatChicago @richard_chu97 @RroseSelavy2 @saxena_puru @stronghobbit @ztinvesting Great thread and thanks for the analysis.

One way to explain why FAANG is slightly absent is that investors who are on Twitter, and sharing publicly are probably more inclined to own growth stocks. That’s my guess anyway
@aagha @paul_essen @PythiaR @RedCoatChicago @richard_chu97 @RroseSelavy2 @saxena_puru @stronghobbit @ztinvesting Great thread and thanks for the analysis.

One way to explain why FAANG is slightly absent is that investors who are on Twitter, and sharing publicly are probably more inclined to own growth stocks. That’s my guess anyway
96 4 4.17% 2 2 0 / 0 0 0
@tylerlastovich I still need to find a good discord group or two to be a part of daily. Still not there yet but getting close
@tylerlastovich I still need to find a good discord group or two to be a part of daily. Still not there yet but getting close
@tylerlastovich I still need to find a good discord group or two to be a part of daily. Still not there yet but getting close
35 0 0.00% 0 0 0 / 0 0 0
@itsKostasWithK Book alone would be tough. I think you’d need a course and speaker fees aswell. Also assuming you have an audience
@itsKostasWithK Book alone would be tough. I think you’d need a course and speaker fees aswell. Also assuming you have an audience
@itsKostasWithK Book alone would be tough. I think you’d need a course and speaker fees aswell. Also assuming you have an audience
33 2 6.06% 1 1 0 / 0 0 0
@GrowthStockInv1 @JonahLupton @ADM83726743 @caleb_investTML @sbrfernandez $TWLO M&amp;A activity has good legs to continue to expand TAM and growth reasonably well. Otherwise maybe less compelling
@GrowthStockInv1 @JonahLupton @ADM83726743 @caleb_investTML @sbrfernandez $TWLO M&A activity has good legs to continue to expand TAM and growth reasonably well. Otherwise maybe less compelling
@GrowthStockInv1 @JonahLupton @ADM83726743 @caleb_investTML @sbrfernandez $TWLO M&A activity has good legs to continue to expand TAM and growth reasonably well. Otherwise maybe less compelling
239 3 1.26% 2 0 0 / 0 0 1
@vanLuVentures Great way to break it out, thanks!
@vanLuVentures Great way to break it out, thanks!
@vanLuVentures Great way to break it out, thanks!
14 1 7.14% 1 0 0 / 0 0 0
@OfficialBBrooks @Jason Also assuming that Jason did not charge people to pitch to him
@OfficialBBrooks @Jason Also assuming that Jason did not charge people to pitch to him
@OfficialBBrooks @Jason Also assuming that Jason did not charge people to pitch to him
157 5 3.18% 3 0 0 / 0 0 2
@learnvesting @iexcloud
75 3 4.00% 1 1 0 / 0 0 1
While Slack may get revamped through Salesforce, the last hour has made me incredibly bullish on Discord. I still think more of my networks are on Slack more actively, but wouldn’t be surprised if this changes unless $CRM really pushes it
While Slack may get revamped through Salesforce, the last hour has made me incredibly bullish on Discord. I still think more of my networks are on Slack more actively, but wouldn’t be surprised if this changes unless $CRM really pushes it
While Slack may get revamped through Salesforce, the last hour has made me incredibly bullish on Discord. I still think more of my networks are on Slack more actively, but wouldn’t be surprised if this changes unless $CRM really pushes it
1,251 11 0.88% 5 2 1 / 0 0 3
@Austen Will be interesting to see how many people are happy to add contact via phone numbers and not another way
@Austen Will be interesting to see how many people are happy to add contact via phone numbers and not another way
@Austen Will be interesting to see how many people are happy to add contact via phone numbers and not another way
1,222 3 0.25% 1 1 0 / 0 0 1
Playing around with coding a Discord bot. Of course my first example is getting stock prices through discord! loom.com/share/23889fe7… pic.twitter.com/0kdlh2oLib
Playing around with coding a Discord bot.

Of course my first example is getting stock prices through discord!

loom.com/share/23889fe7… pic.twitter.com/0kdlh2oLib
Playing around with coding a Discord bot.

Of course my first example is getting stock prices through discord!

loom.com/share/23889fe7… pic.twitter.com/0kdlh2oLib
5,256 35 0.67% 11 1 0 / 1 15 7
@gannonbreslin @goingdeepchadjt I think Barstool should pick them up
@gannonbreslin @goingdeepchadjt I think Barstool should pick them up
@gannonbreslin @goingdeepchadjt I think Barstool should pick them up
100 1 1.00% 1 0 0 / 0 0 0
@gannonbreslin @goingdeepchadjt These guys are so good
@gannonbreslin @goingdeepchadjt These guys are so good
@gannonbreslin @goingdeepchadjt These guys are so good
132 2 1.52% 1 1 0 / 0 0 0
10 year minimum before 🐐 status can be talked about twitter.com/pricingpow/sta…
10 year minimum before 🐐 status can be talked about https://twitter.com/pricingpow/status/1347853729769390080
10 year minimum before 🐐 status can be talked about https://twitter.com/pricingpow/status/1347853729769390080
6,178 26 0.42% 12 0 1 / 0 0 13
@RevShark Have you checked out @JoinCommonstock
@RevShark Have you checked out @JoinCommonstock
@RevShark Have you checked out @JoinCommonstock
192 5 2.60% 2 0 0 / 0 0 3
@YuriyYarovoy @DruRly Just tagged you in it
@YuriyYarovoy @DruRly Just tagged you in it
@YuriyYarovoy @DruRly Just tagged you in it
72 5 6.94% 2 1 0 / 0 0 2
A community member of Trends.vc group just brought the heat 🔥 I've told @DruRly that he needs to raise his prices, and I'll say it again. pic.twitter.com/uNUAFdgekH
A community member of Trends.vc group just brought the heat 🔥

I've told @DruRly that he needs to raise his prices, and I'll say it again. pic.twitter.com/uNUAFdgekH
A community member of Trends.vc group just brought the heat 🔥

I've told @DruRly that he needs to raise his prices, and I'll say it again. pic.twitter.com/uNUAFdgekH
1,697 43 2.53% 4 2 0 / 0 18 19
@ShaulGoo That is the challenge! ;) How to get $5m of "equity" to cash flow.
@ShaulGoo That is the challenge! ;)

How to get $5m of "equity" to cash flow.
@ShaulGoo That is the challenge! ;)

How to get $5m of "equity" to cash flow.
35 3 8.57% 1 0 0 / 0 0 2
@ShaulGoo Not bad thoughts. A bit out of the exercise here though. Thinking low-liquidity so maybe all of $5m is not stocks which you can sell or convert to dividend stocks.
@ShaulGoo Not bad thoughts. A bit out of the exercise here though. Thinking low-liquidity so maybe all of $5m is not stocks which you can sell or convert to dividend stocks.
@ShaulGoo Not bad thoughts. A bit out of the exercise here though. Thinking low-liquidity so maybe all of $5m is not stocks which you can sell or convert to dividend stocks.
39 1 2.56% 0 1 0 / 0 0 0
@JunseoDavid I like the idea of direct sponsorships. I think this is the way to go initially. Line up 24 great guests and start with 0 audience. Charge $8,500 to sponsor each episode. Might only get &lt;1,000 views but guests are such high caliber you could make the case its worth it.
@JunseoDavid I like the idea of direct sponsorships. I think this is the way to go initially. Line up 24 great guests and start with 0 audience. Charge $8,500 to sponsor each episode. Might only get <1,000 views but guests are such high caliber you could make the case its worth it.
@JunseoDavid I like the idea of direct sponsorships. I think this is the way to go initially. Line up 24 great guests and start with 0 audience. Charge $8,500 to sponsor each episode. Might only get <1,000 views but guests are such high caliber you could make the case its worth it.
33 0 0.00% 0 0 0 / 0 0 0
@nateritter True. The more money you have, the more you are probably willing to pay which is funny. Comes back to the "mentality" side of it.
@nateritter True.

The more money you have, the more you are probably willing to pay which is funny.

Comes back to the "mentality" side of it.
@nateritter True.

The more money you have, the more you are probably willing to pay which is funny.

Comes back to the "mentality" side of it.
39 2 5.13% 1 1 0 / 0 0 0
@nateritter For this argument I would say performance based. Many multi-millionaires I would say the core of how its done is the same: equity over time. Time periods and degree of luck change. How to convey the "simplicity" in a valuable way is very interesting.
@nateritter For this argument I would say performance based.

Many multi-millionaires I would say the core of how its done is the same: equity over time. Time periods and degree of luck change.

How to convey the "simplicity" in a valuable way is very interesting.
@nateritter For this argument I would say performance based.

Many multi-millionaires I would say the core of how its done is the same: equity over time. Time periods and degree of luck change.

How to convey the "simplicity" in a valuable way is very interesting.
48 2 4.17% 1 1 0 / 0 0 0
@Kakashi_fandom My net worth is not $5m
@Kakashi_fandom My net worth is not $5m
@Kakashi_fandom My net worth is not $5m
20 0 0.00% 0 0 0 / 0 0 0
@Kakashi_fandom The assumption is that all your $5m is in non-cash producing assets. So the path to rolling getting $200k in dividends is interesting.
@Kakashi_fandom The assumption is that all your $5m is in non-cash producing assets. So the path to rolling getting $200k in dividends is interesting.
@Kakashi_fandom The assumption is that all your $5m is in non-cash producing assets. So the path to rolling getting $200k in dividends is interesting.
15 0 0.00% 0 0 0 / 0 0 0
@ShaulGoo Do you mean dividends?
@ShaulGoo Do you mean dividends?
@ShaulGoo Do you mean dividends?
62 1 1.61% 0 1 0 / 0 0 0
@nateritter Courses could be very interesting. Depends how "Sexy" the path to $5m was. I would generally guess not sexy enough to sell as a course. But I like your thoughts here and have thought about courses a lot personally. Just need to do a better job creating value ..but I like courses
@nateritter Courses could be very interesting. Depends how "Sexy" the path to $5m was. I would generally guess not sexy enough to sell as a course. But I like your thoughts here and have thought about courses a lot personally. Just need to do a better job creating value

..but I like courses
@nateritter Courses could be very interesting. Depends how "Sexy" the path to $5m was. I would generally guess not sexy enough to sell as a course. But I like your thoughts here and have thought about courses a lot personally. Just need to do a better job creating value

..but I like courses
82 2 2.44% 1 1 0 / 0 0 0
@JunseoDavid Not bad. At $4.50 CPM, you'd need 44 million views. Might take a couple of years to get to that scale.
@JunseoDavid Not bad. At $4.50 CPM, you'd need 44 million views. Might take a couple of years to get to that scale.
@JunseoDavid Not bad. At $4.50 CPM, you'd need 44 million views. Might take a couple of years to get to that scale.
71 1 1.41% 0 1 0 / 0 0 0
@Kakashi_fandom Interesting. Yeah I'll have to look into what volume and frequency of this to make sense.
@Kakashi_fandom Interesting. Yeah I'll have to look into what volume and frequency of this to make sense.
@Kakashi_fandom Interesting. Yeah I'll have to look into what volume and frequency of this to make sense.
75 4 5.33% 0 2 0 / 0 0 2
@tylerlastovich Agreed! Trying to think of the best way to unpack it
@tylerlastovich Agreed! Trying to think of the best way to unpack it
@tylerlastovich Agreed! Trying to think of the best way to unpack it
24 1 4.17% 0 1 0 / 0 0 0
If you have $5m net worth, low liquidity, with $0 cash flow and no job. How would you best try and cash flow $200k/year? twitter.com/ignorenarrativ…
If you have $5m net worth, low liquidity, with $0 cash flow and no job.

How would you best try and cash flow $200k/year? https://twitter.com/ignorenarrative/status/1347998558016974848
If you have $5m net worth, low liquidity, with $0 cash flow and no job.

How would you best try and cash flow $200k/year? https://twitter.com/ignorenarrative/status/1347998558016974848
2,683 13 0.48% 0 7 0 / 1 0 5
So much to unpack here. Great way to audit your life twitter.com/julian/status/…
So much to unpack here.

Great way to audit your life https://twitter.com/julian/status/1348001394104537089
So much to unpack here.

Great way to audit your life https://twitter.com/julian/status/1348001394104537089
1,245 5 0.40% 1 1 0 / 0 0 3
@PaulYacoubian Love to see worlds in my orbit colliding
@PaulYacoubian Love to see worlds in my orbit colliding
@PaulYacoubian Love to see worlds in my orbit colliding
439 7 1.59% 4 0 0 / 0 0 3
@Mat_Sherman @growthmeter Cool way to do it. I should be using lists more honestly. But yeah this is next level
@Mat_Sherman @growthmeter Cool way to do it. I should be using lists more honestly. But yeah this is next level
@Mat_Sherman @growthmeter Cool way to do it. I should be using lists more honestly. But yeah this is next level
76 1 1.32% 0 0 0 / 0 0 1
@Mat_Sherman @growthmeter 🔥
88 3 3.41% 0 1 0 / 0 0 2
@agazdecki @microacquire Would love to be in
@agazdecki @microacquire Would love to be in
@agazdecki @microacquire Would love to be in
89 1 1.12% 1 0 0 / 0 0 0
I’m curious as to how @digg sold for just $250k...seems like a steal twitter.com/kevinrose/stat…
I’m curious as to how @digg sold for just $250k...seems like a steal https://twitter.com/kevinrose/status/1347747289511563265
I’m curious as to how @digg sold for just $250k...seems like a steal https://twitter.com/kevinrose/status/1347747289511563265
1,321 12 0.91% 2 0 0 / 0 0 10
@bgrynol Love this. So powerful to have all of this written down.
@bgrynol Love this. So powerful to have all of this written down.
@bgrynol Love this. So powerful to have all of this written down.
12 1 8.33% 1 0 0 / 0 0 0
@MoneyShark_ The $4.5b is GMV right?
@MoneyShark_ The $4.5b is GMV right?
@MoneyShark_ The $4.5b is GMV right?
35 0 0.00% 0 0 0 / 0 0 0
@rupeshparab15 Sad but true
@rupeshparab15 Sad but true
@rupeshparab15 Sad but true
61 0 0.00% 0 0 0 / 0 0 0
Had a friend who worked for Nancy Zevenbergen. Considering the love Cathie gets, surprise more people don’t bring up Nancy. 16.4% returns a year for 15 years...and long $LMND too pic.twitter.com/xFVaooqba8
Had a friend who worked for Nancy Zevenbergen.

Considering the love Cathie gets, surprise more people don’t bring up Nancy.

16.4% returns a year for 15 years...and long $LMND too pic.twitter.com/xFVaooqba8
Had a friend who worked for Nancy Zevenbergen.

Considering the love Cathie gets, surprise more people don’t bring up Nancy.

16.4% returns a year for 15 years...and long $LMND too pic.twitter.com/xFVaooqba8
2,237 17 0.76% 9 3 1 / 0 0 4
@jayvasdigital 👋
179 1 0.56% 1 0 0 / 0 0 0
@yarobagriy @ShaanVP I’m a bit behind on this with my BTC honestly. But slowly getting there
@yarobagriy @ShaanVP I’m a bit behind on this with my BTC honestly. But slowly getting there
@yarobagriy @ShaanVP I’m a bit behind on this with my BTC honestly. But slowly getting there
102 2 1.96% 1 0 0 / 0 0 1
@yarobagriy @ShaanVP I like to think of things this way...not perfect but...if it 10x’s it should double your net worth
@yarobagriy @ShaanVP I like to think of things this way...not perfect but...if it 10x’s it should double your net worth
@yarobagriy @ShaanVP I like to think of things this way...not perfect but...if it 10x’s it should double your net worth
159 2 1.26% 1 1 0 / 0 0 0
@Mat_Sherman Love the “Arena” name 👌
@Mat_Sherman Love the “Arena” name 👌
@Mat_Sherman Love the “Arena” name 👌
98 3 3.06% 0 1 0 / 0 0 2
@Tradinghub_CA @saxena_puru @cperruna @breakingoptions @jtraderco @BrianFeroldi @WarlusTrades Thanks. Starting to get interesting again
56 2 3.57% 1 1 0 / 0 0 0
@StockMarketNerd @chamath @SoFi @RobinhoodApp Was lowkey hoping that $AONE.U would target SoFi Hard to go against Chamath though
@StockMarketNerd @chamath @SoFi @RobinhoodApp Was lowkey hoping that $AONE.U would target SoFi

Hard to go against Chamath though
@StockMarketNerd @chamath @SoFi @RobinhoodApp Was lowkey hoping that $AONE.U would target SoFi

Hard to go against Chamath though
1,757 3 0.17% 1 1 0 / 0 0 1
@AndrewHolder22 Team $46!
@AndrewHolder22 Team $46!
@AndrewHolder22 Team $46!
137 4 2.92% 1 0 0 / 0 0 3
Does anyone hedge the market after massive green days like this? Buy/Sell $SPY puts/calls?
Does anyone hedge the market after massive green days like this?

Buy/Sell $SPY puts/calls?
Does anyone hedge the market after massive green days like this?

Buy/Sell $SPY puts/calls?
1,251 11 0.88% 0 2 0 / 0 0 9
@janhp98 Yeah not surprised. Nice to get in before they started this but the fundamentals have not changed since last earnings.
@janhp98 Yeah not surprised. Nice to get in before they started this but the fundamentals have not changed since last earnings.
@janhp98 Yeah not surprised. Nice to get in before they started this but the fundamentals have not changed since last earnings.
249 2 0.80% 1 0 0 / 0 0 1
Started building into $LMND on 10/1 6 buys over the next 3 months to an average cost of $61 Currently up 148% Just pushed out $AMZN for the top spot in my portfolio at 17% Going to be a very wild earnings. Struggle to imagine a positive post earnings move.
Started building into $LMND on 10/1

6 buys over the next 3 months to an average cost of $61

Currently up 148%

Just pushed out $AMZN for the top spot in my portfolio at 17%

Going to be a very wild earnings. Struggle to imagine a positive post earnings move.
Started building into $LMND on 10/1

6 buys over the next 3 months to an average cost of $61

Currently up 148%

Just pushed out $AMZN for the top spot in my portfolio at 17%

Going to be a very wild earnings. Struggle to imagine a positive post earnings move.
3,940 77 1.95% 31 1 0 / 0 0 45
@GoldMarket @chamath @mcuban Yeah I'm starting to do a deeper dive on them and $ROOT
@GoldMarket @chamath @mcuban Yeah I'm starting to do a deeper dive on them and $ROOT
@GoldMarket @chamath @mcuban Yeah I'm starting to do a deeper dive on them and $ROOT
597 3 0.50% 1 1 0 / 0 0 1
@itsKostasWithK Yeah just moved into my largest position haha
@itsKostasWithK Yeah just moved into my largest position haha
@itsKostasWithK Yeah just moved into my largest position haha
303 3 0.99% 1 0 0 / 0 0 2
If you like $LMND at $150, you’ll love it at $70
If you like $LMND at $150, you’ll love it at $70
If you like $LMND at $150, you’ll love it at $70
5,911 53 0.90% 21 3 0 / 0 0 29
@itsKostasWithK @ParrotStock @StockMarketNerd @KermitCapital @JonahLupton @OphirGottlieb @FromValue @saxena_puru @InvestmentTalkk @richard_chu97 Looking forward to 2021 and beyond. Thanks.
93 4 4.30% 3 0 0 / 0 0 1
@HodlTarantula Close, that too I guess. $LMND
@HodlTarantula Close, that too I guess.

$LMND
@HodlTarantula Close, that too I guess.

$LMND
246 1 0.41% 0 0 0 / 0 0 1
@MasaSonCap footage of me waking up 10minutes ago pic.twitter.com/ixee70EfQS
@MasaSonCap footage of me waking up 10minutes ago pic.twitter.com/ixee70EfQS
@MasaSonCap footage of me waking up 10minutes ago pic.twitter.com/ixee70EfQS
4,028 8 0.20% 2 0 0 / 2 0 4
@seandougfan One of the few that I’m very bearish on
@seandougfan One of the few that I’m very bearish on
@seandougfan One of the few that I’m very bearish on
83 5 6.02% 1 0 0 / 0 0 4
@MasaSonCap Thanks 2021, big year!!
@MasaSonCap Thanks 2021, big year!!
@MasaSonCap Thanks 2021, big year!!
115 3 2.61% 1 0 0 / 0 0 2
@NotoriousGrow Was able to talk/zoom/meet great people in 6 month period where we were asked not to leave our houses. Found a community of people trying to build cool things with a purpose, in a time when my purpose was taken away from me
@NotoriousGrow Was able to talk/zoom/meet great people in 6 month period where we were asked not to leave our houses.

Found a community of people trying to build cool things with a purpose, in a time when my purpose was taken away from me
@NotoriousGrow Was able to talk/zoom/meet great people in 6 month period where we were asked not to leave our houses.

Found a community of people trying to build cool things with a purpose, in a time when my purpose was taken away from me
78 3 3.85% 1 1 0 / 0 0 1
If I was starting investing today my portfolio would look reasonably different. $SHOP $SQ $TDOC $TTD $CRWD* $NVDA* Maybe $ZM too. The point is, when starting, I feel these appear less expensive than they appear to me now *Already own.
If I was starting investing today my portfolio would look reasonably different.

$SHOP
$SQ
$TDOC
$TTD
$CRWD*
$NVDA*

Maybe $ZM too. The point is, when starting, I feel these appear less expensive than they appear to me now

*Already own.
If I was starting investing today my portfolio would look reasonably different.

$SHOP
$SQ
$TDOC
$TTD
$CRWD*
$NVDA*

Maybe $ZM too. The point is, when starting, I feel these appear less expensive than they appear to me now

*Already own.
4,025 29 0.72% 9 0 0 / 0 0 20
Nov 2019: Left job in USA March 7th: Named to the Australian Olympic rowing team March 18th: Games are cancelled, enter lockdown. March 19th: Joined Twitter Very grateful for so many amazing people here, you all had such a positive impact on my life to get through 2020 pic.twitter.com/ve1YgoS7Js
Nov 2019: Left job in USA
March 7th: Named to the Australian Olympic rowing team
March 18th: Games are cancelled, enter lockdown.
March 19th: Joined Twitter

Very grateful for so many amazing people here, you all had such a positive impact on my life to get through 2020 pic.twitter.com/ve1YgoS7Js
Nov 2019: Left job in USA
March 7th: Named to the Australian Olympic rowing team
March 18th: Games are cancelled, enter lockdown.
March 19th: Joined Twitter

Very grateful for so many amazing people here, you all had such a positive impact on my life to get through 2020 pic.twitter.com/ve1YgoS7Js
9,227 212 2.30% 36 1 0 / 1 0 174
@packyM @LeanSardine Don't you still have to be accredited for Rolling Funds?
@packyM @LeanSardine Don't you still have to be accredited for Rolling Funds?
@packyM @LeanSardine Don't you still have to be accredited for Rolling Funds?
144 1 0.69% 0 1 0 / 0 0 0
@cameroniadeluca Convert to BTC and getting hit harder
@cameroniadeluca Convert to BTC and getting hit harder
@cameroniadeluca Convert to BTC and getting hit harder
409 3 0.73% 2 0 0 / 0 0 1